copyright

Post image for Google loses Belgian copyright case

Google loses Belgian copyright case

by alec on May 11, 2011

Apparently Belgium newspapers don’t want to be part of the internet.  The Belgian appeals court has said that Google infringes their copyrights when it publishes excerpts of what they write on Google News.  The company now faces a fine of approximately €25,000 per day until it comes into compliance.  In addition, the suit asks for €49m in damages.  The plaintiff contends that the traffic to the damaged news sites was detrimental to their businesses.

How 1995…

Enhanced by Zemanta

{ 0 comments }

Post image for Bill C-32 enshrines planned obsolescence

Bill C-32 enshrines planned obsolescence

by alec on December 6, 2010

In my basement, there are three milk crates of vinyl records – the music I collected in my teens.  Those records haven’t been played in a very long time.  They became obsolete in October 1982 with the introduction of the audio CD.  CD’s were convenient, easy, and mostly scratch proof.  We all loved them, and vinyl went the way of the dodo.

Upstairs in my living room, there are two 300 disc Pioneer carousel’s fitted to our home stereo. These became obsolete in April 2003, with the introduction of Apple’s now ubiquitous iTunes store.   Digital media meant that we could take our music anywhere.  Even more convenient than CD, it once again changed the way that we listened to music.

In 2003, I unloaded the carousels, digitized every CD, and moved the music collection to an Audio Request ARQ-1 music server where it could be played by the family at will from anywhere in the house and loaded onto an iPod for personal listening.

Last night I bought Messiaen’s La nativité du seigneur from the iTunes store. I had a hankering to hear Dieu Parmi Nous after going out to a Christmas service yesterday afternoon. Like much of the music I buy today, La nativité will never see physical media.  It exists as a stream of bits stored on my iPhone, my PC, and my backup server.

Media format shifts in the music industry have happened twice in my lifetime.  Each shift has generated a boost in revenues for the entertainment industry, as consumers have re-bought media they previously owned, but in the new format.

  1. Many of my old vinyl records I bought again on CD.
  2. With the advent of iTunes, many tracks on vinyl that didn’t make the transition to CD I later rediscovered in the iTunes store.

The music industry has made good money from me selling me my old favorites again and again.

Today that same transition is happening with video.  A few weeks ago I bought a BoxeeBox which allows me to stream video from the Internet to my TV, or from a local store in my house.  For the last couple of weeks I’ve been digitizing our collection of DVD’s in order to allow them to be watched anywhere in the house, or on my iPhone or iPad device.  At the same time I signed up for a NetFlix subscription, and for $8/mo we can watch movies to our hearts content on any PC, the television, or iPod or iPhone that we own.

And that brings me to my point.

Media formats have changed over time, and will continue to change.  The same is true of the devices that we use to to consume that media.  That’s the technology business.

Consumer advocates believe that consumers should have the right to purchase a license for media content, and consume it in whatever fashion they choose.  The distribution media – whether it be bits, vinyl, or plastic discs, shouldn’t have any bearing.   Morever, the entertainment industry has discovered, much to its chagrin, that encouraging format shifting is better for business as well.  How many blu-ray discs also come with a digital media file now, so that you can watch the movie you’ve purchased on another device?  Plenty!

Bill C-32, the Canadian copyright bill currently before Parliament, is a fairly balanced piece of legislation.  It gives we consumers the right to format shift media for our own consumption, instead of re-buying that media. And it gives the entertainment industry broad rights to prosecute content thieves — those who never bought the content in the first place.

The big flaw in Bill C-32 is in the section on digital locks.  A content owner can lock a piece of digital media, and this bill would make it illegal to unlock it, even to make a backup copy.  With a simply digital lock, the content owner can take away all the rights that a consumer has under the law.  It’s a return to the early days of the United States Digital Millenium Copyright Act just as the US is relaxing key provisions of that legislation as they relate to locks. It’s a step in the wrong direction, and out of step with evolving industry practice today.

A lot of folks are urging the government to pass C-32. The argument is that we, as a nation, can’t afford to wait any longer for copyright reform.  Apparently we’re becoming digital pariah’s because folks like Hulu won’t provide their service in Canada.

Baloney.

We’ve survived until now with our existing copyright regime. We should wait, and get this right, rather than pass a flawed bill — a bill that permits content owners to negate hard-won consumer rights through digital locks.

{ 2 comments }

“Get out of Jail Free” says US Copyright Office

July 26, 2010
Thumbnail image for “Get out of Jail Free” says US Copyright Office

In the spring of 2008 I slipped out of my hotel in San Jose, and headed over to the mall to buy an iPhone.  I remember the conversation with the clerk vividly.  He offered to activate it for me, and I said “No, I’m going to unlock it for use in Canada.” Shortly after, I [...]

Read the full article →

301 Redirect: Copyright and Culture

May 4, 2009

What would it mean if you had to pay a royalty to perform a piece of music in your own home? Perhaps at some point in the future, you might pay ten cents for each performance of a lullaby that you sing to your child. Sounds absurd, doesn’t it?  It strikes to the heart of [...]

Read the full article →

Will Apple’s stance on DRM affect Canadian law?

January 7, 2009

The world is abuzz this morning that the minor demons of the recording industry have kissed Steve Job’s ring, agreeing to scrap DRM on iTunes downloads.  As Michael Geist said: “this decision continues to shift away from the failed strategy of locks and levies, though the industry is still vigorously promoting anti-circumvention laws to protect [...]

Read the full article →

Squawk Box October 20: Virtual Worlds, Entertainment Industry Stupidity, and more!

October 20, 2008

On this morning’s conference call, we discuss a wide range of topics from virtual worlds to the latest entertainment industry craziness.

Read the full article →

Squawk Box June 19 with Michael Geist

June 19, 2008

Image by yulbuzz via Flickr The last few weeks have been terrible set backs for personal privacy, and the privileges ordinary people enjoy when they buy and use music, video and other forms of media. Today’s guest was Dr. Michael Geist, an internationally recognized expert in these areas. We discussed Bill C-61 the Canadian copyright [...]

Read the full article →

Canadian Copyright Reform would make me and my family into criminals.

June 16, 2008

Image via Wikipedia Friday, a day after the government tabled its bill on copyright reform, I got a call back from my MP, Pierre Poilievre. I had telephoned him earlier in the week to talk about the rumours I had heard about copyright. Pierre hadn’t read the bill, but asked what my concerns were anyway. [...]

Read the full article →

Squawk Box June 5

June 5, 2008

One of the current themes in the blogging world these days is how iPhone 2.0 will be the second coming of location services on handsets. I have a PILE of location enabled handsets already, with location based apps popping out the ears – maps, and navigation being the biggies. We discuss what would it take to for iPhone to really drive this forward that say, Nokia, isn’t already doing. One of the biggest issues is the time required to get a fix. Wouldn’t a network based location service be a better choice for consumers?

Secondly, one of the themes that’s on my mind these days is privacy, and individual rights. This morning we discuss two more stories around these issues:

The first is the cell phone study that secretly tracked 100K people to find out what they did during the day… anonymously, of course. And without their permission. Carriers already track this data. We ask whether there is an ethical issue around releasing it in this form. More to the point, however… what are the rules that govern the collection of this data, and how are those rules made?

The second is for Canadian listeners. Industry minister Jim Prentice is gearing up (amidst public protest) to try to introduce another copyright reform bill in Canada. Michael Geist has dubbed it the Canadian DMCA. We talk about copyright reform, the success or failure of the DMCA in the US, and what Prentice’s bill might mean to us here in the Great White North.

With any luck, the bill won’t be introduced before summer.

Read the full article →

Two BSers BSing about Art and the Internet

April 14, 2008

The phonograph was invented by Thomas Edison in 1877, and the first commercial recordings marketed in 1888. By 1929 record sales were a business generating annual sales of $75 million, but by 1938 sales were just $26 million. Radio had dealt commercial recordings a heavy blow, as radio ownership grew from 2 out of 5 [...]

Read the full article →
Alec on LinkedIn Alec on Twitter Alec on Facebook Calliflower on Youtube RSS Feed Contact me