Bell Canada

Rogers Home Phone. Too little, too late?

by alec on June 15, 2009

Late Friday afternoon, “Mookie” from Rogers called to talk about our phone service.  Rogers is pushing to convert as many of their customers from the incumbent Bell Canada over to Rogers Home Phone.  Rogers has a plan for $30.95 per month which gives you 5 calling features, and 1,000 minutes of long distance in North America.  But it’s actually not $30.95, after you add in the system access fee of $5.95 and other miscellaneous fees, the bill is closer to $40. 

We’re probably paying more on Bell, but I don’t really know how much more.  With Bell we’re paying $25 per month to get unlimited long distance (yeah – over 40,000 minutes), and we’re paying for some additional features.  Mookie argued that hardly anybody ever uses more than 1,000 minutes per month.  1,000 minutes is nearly 17 hours of calling.  He’s probably right that we would never use more than 1,000 minutes, especially considering that I already spend $5/month with my mobile plan to get 1,000 minutes long distance on that phone.  Woe betide you if you use more than the 1,000 minutes however – Uncle Ted’s rate on overage is a steep $.12/minute.

I didn’t take him up on his offer. 

“Mookie”, I said “my home phone bill just isn’t painful enough for me to switch.  Now, if you could do something about my outrageous monthly mobile bill, or the ridiculous price I pay for substandard broadband, then we’d be in business.”  Mookie demurred, saying that he only represented the home phone service. 

The hassles associated with porting our number, the equipment installation, and the things I’ve heard about Rogers Home Phone incompatibilities with security systems were enough to dissuade me.  If Google Voice ever comes to Canada with number portability, we might reconsider.  For now, however, we’ll pay a couple bucks extra per month and stick with the Bell system.

I suspect that there are a lot of people like us out there.  When Vonage came to Canada people flocked to sign up, us included.  Bell responded some months later with the current $25 all you can eat plan, which stemmed that tide.  Rogers is going to have to do something equally dramatic in order to win market share.  How about home phone on cable with unlimited long distance across North America for $10/month, no system access fee, and features that Bell not only doesn’t have but probably can’t easily provide? $40/month, however, is just too little, too late.

What do you think?  Would you switch?  Or does Rogers have to do more to win your business?

{ 10 comments }

They ARE a phone company, after all…

by alec on December 16, 2006

I skipped over to Bell Canada’s web site a few minutes ago, looking for whether or not the Ottawa/Buffalo game tonight was going to broadcast in high definition.  Most of the time it isn’t, and tonight is no different.  Hockey Night in Canada really oughta be renamed Hockey Night in Toronto with Don Cherry and the Maple Leafs… but I digress.

What was I confronted with when I arrived at the site?  Well, take a look.

OK.  So, Bell’s a little behind on their browser support.  I am using IE 7, not 6, and it’s only been out for a couple of months or so now.   And what do I care if they want to pop up spurious warnings?

Except that Bell Sympatico is the partnership between Microsoft and Bell Canada.  Bell Sympatico is the ISP that owns the rights to MSN in Canada.  You would think that Bell Canada, of all the ISP’s out there, would be johnny on the spot supporting Microsoft’s new browser, wouldn’t you?  Then again, they are a phone company.  That might be expecting a little too much from them.

How do you suppose they plan to compete against those lightweight internet companies, anyway?  It’s an interesting question, now that they’ve won their battle to deregulate internet telephony.

Oh well… game time!

{ 4 comments }

The Meaning of Free Speech

September 16, 2005

The Economist uses EBay’s acquisition of Skype as a jumping off point to discuss a number of issues, including the vulnerability of traditional telecoms pricing models to VoIP.  According to the Economist, Niklas Zennstrom’s vision for Skype is "to become the world’s biggest and best platform for all communications—text, voice or video—from any internet-connected device, whether [...]

Read the full article →

ILEC Landline Attrition Accelerates

August 16, 2005

James Enck has just posted annualized rates of landline attrition for several ILECs.  The numbers are shocking.  Attrition has doubled in the first half of this year, with some US states seeing annualized rates as high as 16%.  I’ve previously written about this in the context of Bell Canada and CRTC policy, but it looks [...]

Read the full article →

TiVo Networks

October 9, 2003

Tivo follows ReplayTV‘s lead.  Both of these are excellent products.  I want one of them!  My PC is jammed full of digital photo’s that I want to show on my spiffy HDTV in the media room.   My home is wired with a network to allow me to do exactly that, including a network access point in the media [...]

Read the full article →
Alec on LinkedIn Alec on Twitter Alec on Facebook Calliflower on Youtube RSS Feed Contact me