<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eComm Europe kickoff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2009/10/28/ecomm-europe-kickoff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2009/10/28/ecomm-europe-kickoff/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ecomm-europe-kickoff</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2009/10/28/ecomm-europe-kickoff/#comment-8071</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Greenfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2009/10/28/ecomm-europe-kickoff/#comment-8071</guid>
		<description>Interesting juxtaposition.  What seems to be missing from this discussion is the fact that ever-increasing demand for megabits is forcing carriers to expand network capacity, which comes at a high cost.  And ultimately those costs will be covered by someone.  Right now the only &quot;someone&quot; in sight is the end user, perhaps offset somewhat by the government.  (The two-sided model is still, by and large, below the radar.) 
 
As the cash cow per-minute voice model gives way to VOIP, where will the carriers go for funds to cover the costs of this endless build-out?   In the U.S. the net neutrality drumbeat seems to be forcing carriers (ever-fearful of falling into the abyss of the &quot;dumb pipe&quot; role) toward tiered broadband pricing, which runs counter to Frankston&#039;s ideal. 
 
The two-sided model, with all of its appeal, seems an elusive goal in the near term, at least in the U.S.   The government can&#039;t mandate it, and the carriers don&#039;t yet embrace it.  And so it appears that we will soon be trading one flawed model for another, awaiting the day that the carriers wake up to the additional revenue opportunities staring them in the face. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting juxtaposition.  What seems to be missing from this discussion is the fact that ever-increasing demand for megabits is forcing carriers to expand network capacity, which comes at a high cost.  And ultimately those costs will be covered by someone.  Right now the only &quot;someone&quot; in sight is the end user, perhaps offset somewhat by the government.  (The two-sided model is still, by and large, below the radar.) </p>
<p>As the cash cow per-minute voice model gives way to VOIP, where will the carriers go for funds to cover the costs of this endless build-out?   In the U.S. the net neutrality drumbeat seems to be forcing carriers (ever-fearful of falling into the abyss of the &quot;dumb pipe&quot; role) toward tiered broadband pricing, which runs counter to Frankston&#039;s ideal. </p>
<p>The two-sided model, with all of its appeal, seems an elusive goal in the near term, at least in the U.S.   The government can&#039;t mandate it, and the carriers don&#039;t yet embrace it.  And so it appears that we will soon be trading one flawed model for another, awaiting the day that the carriers wake up to the additional revenue opportunities staring them in the face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Childs</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2009/10/28/ecomm-europe-kickoff/#comment-8070</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Childs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 05:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2009/10/28/ecomm-europe-kickoff/#comment-8070</guid>
		<description>More on the theme that it&#039;s business process innovation not technology innovation where growth will occur. 
 
Not surprising because there is a LOT of unexploited potential currently in proven technologies. And newer technologies generally push against the same dimensions of use, when they have not been broadly integrated into business or general culture. 
 
Business process innovation is the next step in culture catching up with technology - and in my mind the evolution of the impact of the removal information asymmetries and artificial processes constraints as a basis of profit and control. 
 
That this process is happening because individual insight into artificiality quickly becomes commonly available insight is not surprising. 
 
Longer term this has implications for those most process conservative organizations - governments - because each business that adopts business models that flatten info exchange and remove artificial process (including regulation) roadblocks simply accelerates within the general culture the expectation that this should be possible everywhere. 
 
A new world is truly emerging. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More on the theme that it&#039;s business process innovation not technology innovation where growth will occur. </p>
<p>Not surprising because there is a LOT of unexploited potential currently in proven technologies. And newer technologies generally push against the same dimensions of use, when they have not been broadly integrated into business or general culture. </p>
<p>Business process innovation is the next step in culture catching up with technology &#8211; and in my mind the evolution of the impact of the removal information asymmetries and artificial processes constraints as a basis of profit and control. </p>
<p>That this process is happening because individual insight into artificiality quickly becomes commonly available insight is not surprising. </p>
<p>Longer term this has implications for those most process conservative organizations &#8211; governments &#8211; because each business that adopts business models that flatten info exchange and remove artificial process (including regulation) roadblocks simply accelerates within the general culture the expectation that this should be possible everywhere. </p>
<p>A new world is truly emerging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

