<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Apple’s stance on DRM affect Canadian law?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2009/01/07/will-apples-stance-on-drm-affect-canadian-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2009/01/07/will-apples-stance-on-drm-affect-canadian-law/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=will-apples-stance-on-drm-affect-canadian-law</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2009/01/07/will-apples-stance-on-drm-affect-canadian-law/#comment-7452</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2009/01/07/will-apples-stance-on-drm-affect-canadian-law/#comment-7452</guid>
		<description>I think software is a different beast, and one needs to look at the software and the use case for it.  Server software really should be licensed to a specific device while end user software may be usable on multiple devices. 
 
The nature of software is that it is installed on a device, and usually movable from one device to another, and licensing terms are flexible enough in most cases to accommodate that.  Not only that, but a particular piece of software can often be replaced by a similar piece.  If you don&#039;t like the licensing terms on one, go find one with terms more suited to your tastes. 
 
In short, I don&#039;t have many objections to reasonable rights management on software.  It doesn&#039;t impact me.  It took the software industry more than a decade to figure this out, and the entertainment industry is making all the same mistakes. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think software is a different beast, and one needs to look at the software and the use case for it.  Server software really should be licensed to a specific device while end user software may be usable on multiple devices. </p>
<p>The nature of software is that it is installed on a device, and usually movable from one device to another, and licensing terms are flexible enough in most cases to accommodate that.  Not only that, but a particular piece of software can often be replaced by a similar piece.  If you don&#039;t like the licensing terms on one, go find one with terms more suited to your tastes. </p>
<p>In short, I don&#039;t have many objections to reasonable rights management on software.  It doesn&#039;t impact me.  It took the software industry more than a decade to figure this out, and the entertainment industry is making all the same mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2009/01/07/will-apples-stance-on-drm-affect-canadian-law/#comment-7451</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2009/01/07/will-apples-stance-on-drm-affect-canadian-law/#comment-7451</guid>
		<description>What are your views on creators protecting software? Are locks reasonable? relevant? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are your views on creators protecting software? Are locks reasonable? relevant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

