<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008: The Year that VoIP died</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/12/30/2008-the-year-that-voip-died/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/12/30/2008-the-year-that-voip-died/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=2008-the-year-that-voip-died</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Good Idea Brings Out Another &#124; Voip Secrets Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/12/30/2008-the-year-that-voip-died/#comment-7416</link>
		<dc:creator>One Good Idea Brings Out Another &#124; Voip Secrets Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=4588#comment-7416</guid>
		<description>[...] So with events like this, one thing is certain. VoIP sure isn&#8217;t dead. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So with events like this, one thing is certain. VoIP sure isn&#8217;t dead. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imran Malik</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/12/30/2008-the-year-that-voip-died/#comment-7415</link>
		<dc:creator>Imran Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=4588#comment-7415</guid>
		<description>Impressive piece of information, let me elaborate more on VoIP. Voice over Internet Protocol has been around since many years. But due to lack of sufficient and affordable bandwidth it was not possible to carry carrier grade voice over Internet Protocol. But since the arrival of low cost internet bandwidth and new speech codecs such as G.729, G.723 which utilizes very low payload to carry carrier class voice it has recently been possible to leverage the true benefits of VoIP. G.723 codec utilizes only 6 Kbps (Kilo Bytes/sec) which is capable of maintaining a constant stream of data between peers and deliver carrier grade voice quality. Lets put this way if you have 8 Mbps internet connection, by using G.723 codec you can run upto 100 telephone lines with crystal clear and carrier grade voice quality.  I am also a user of VoIP and have setup a small PBX at home. Since I have discovered VoIP I have never used traditional PSTN service. 
 
Dear readers, if you have not yet tried VoIP I suggest that you try VoIP technology and I bet you will never want to use the traditional PSTN phone service ever again. VoIP has far more superior features to offer which traditional PSTN sadly cannot offer. 
 
Also It has recently been possile to carry Video alongwith VoIP by using low payload video codecs. I cannot resist to tell you that by using T.38 passthrough and disabling VAD VoIP can carry FAX transmission, but beaware FAX T.38 passthrough will only work when using wide band protocols such as G.711, a-Law and u-Law. 
 
By using ATA (Analog Telephone Adapter) which converts VoIP signals into traditional PSTN you can also using Dial-up modems to connect to various dialup services. I wont go in to the details what VoIP can offer, to cut my story short VoIP is a must to have product for every business and individual. 
 
How VoIP Works 
 
When we make a VoIP call, a communication channel is established between caller and called party over IP (Internet Protocol) which runs on top of computer data networks. A telephony conversation that takes place over VoIP are converted into binary data packets streams in real time and transmitted over data network, when these data packets arrive at the destination these are again converted into standard telephony conversation. This whole process of voice conversion into data, transmission and data conversion into back voice conversation takes place within less than few milliseconds. That is how a VoIP is call is transmitted over data networks. I hope that now you understand basics of how a VoIP call takes place. 
 
What are speech codec&#039;s and what role codec plays in VoIP? 
 
Speech codec play a vital role in VoIP and codec determines the quality and cost of the call. Let me explain you what exactly VoIP codec&#8217;s are and how they work. You may have heard about data compression, or probably you have heard about air compressor which compresses a volume of air in enclosed container, VoIP codec&#8217;s are no different than a air compressor. Speech codec&#8217;s compresses voice into data packets and decompresses it upon arrival at destination. Some VoIP codec&#8217;s can compress huge amount of voice while maintaining QoS which means use this type of codec will cost less because it will consume just a fraction of data network. Some codec&#8217;s are just not capable of encoding huge amount of voice they simply consume huge amount of data networks bandwidth hence the cost goes up. 
 
Following is a list of VoIP codec&#8217;s along with how much data network bandwidth they consume. 
 
* AMR Codec 
* BroadVoice Codec 16Kbps narrowband, and 32Kbps wideband 
* GIPS Family - 13.3 Kbps and up 
* GSM - 13 Kbps (full rate), 20ms frame size 
* iLBC - 15Kbps,20ms frame size: 13.3 Kbps, 30ms frame size 
* ITU G.711 - 64 Kbps, sample-based Also known as alaw/ulaw 
* ITU G.722 - 48/56/64 Kbps ADPCM 7Khz audio bandwidth 
* ITU G.722.1 - 24/32 Kbps 7Khz audio bandwidth (based on Polycom&#039;s SIREN codec) 
* ITU G.722.1C - 32 Kbps, a Polycom extension, 14Khz audio bandwidth 
* ITU G.722.2 - 6.6Kbps to 23.85Kbps. Also known as AMR-WB. CELP 7Khz audio bandwidth 
* ITU G.723.1 - 5.3/6.3 Kbps, 30ms frame size 
* ITU G.726 - 16/24/32/40 Kbps 
* ITU G.728 - 16 Kbps 
* ITU G.729 - 8 Kbps, 10ms frame size 
* Speex - 2.15 to 44.2 Kbps 
* LPC10 - 2.5 Kbps 
* DoD CELP - 4.8 Kbps 
 
Switch to VoIP Today and you will never want to use traditional PSTN ever again. 
 
Thanks 
 
-Imran </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressive piece of information, let me elaborate more on VoIP. Voice over Internet Protocol has been around since many years. But due to lack of sufficient and affordable bandwidth it was not possible to carry carrier grade voice over Internet Protocol. But since the arrival of low cost internet bandwidth and new speech codecs such as G.729, G.723 which utilizes very low payload to carry carrier class voice it has recently been possible to leverage the true benefits of VoIP. G.723 codec utilizes only 6 Kbps (Kilo Bytes/sec) which is capable of maintaining a constant stream of data between peers and deliver carrier grade voice quality. Lets put this way if you have 8 Mbps internet connection, by using G.723 codec you can run upto 100 telephone lines with crystal clear and carrier grade voice quality.  I am also a user of VoIP and have setup a small PBX at home. Since I have discovered VoIP I have never used traditional PSTN service. </p>
<p>Dear readers, if you have not yet tried VoIP I suggest that you try VoIP technology and I bet you will never want to use the traditional PSTN phone service ever again. VoIP has far more superior features to offer which traditional PSTN sadly cannot offer. </p>
<p>Also It has recently been possile to carry Video alongwith VoIP by using low payload video codecs. I cannot resist to tell you that by using T.38 passthrough and disabling VAD VoIP can carry FAX transmission, but beaware FAX T.38 passthrough will only work when using wide band protocols such as G.711, a-Law and u-Law. </p>
<p>By using ATA (Analog Telephone Adapter) which converts VoIP signals into traditional PSTN you can also using Dial-up modems to connect to various dialup services. I wont go in to the details what VoIP can offer, to cut my story short VoIP is a must to have product for every business and individual. </p>
<p>How VoIP Works </p>
<p>When we make a VoIP call, a communication channel is established between caller and called party over IP (Internet Protocol) which runs on top of computer data networks. A telephony conversation that takes place over VoIP are converted into binary data packets streams in real time and transmitted over data network, when these data packets arrive at the destination these are again converted into standard telephony conversation. This whole process of voice conversion into data, transmission and data conversion into back voice conversation takes place within less than few milliseconds. That is how a VoIP is call is transmitted over data networks. I hope that now you understand basics of how a VoIP call takes place. </p>
<p>What are speech codec&#039;s and what role codec plays in VoIP? </p>
<p>Speech codec play a vital role in VoIP and codec determines the quality and cost of the call. Let me explain you what exactly VoIP codec&rsquo;s are and how they work. You may have heard about data compression, or probably you have heard about air compressor which compresses a volume of air in enclosed container, VoIP codec&rsquo;s are no different than a air compressor. Speech codec&rsquo;s compresses voice into data packets and decompresses it upon arrival at destination. Some VoIP codec&rsquo;s can compress huge amount of voice while maintaining QoS which means use this type of codec will cost less because it will consume just a fraction of data network. Some codec&rsquo;s are just not capable of encoding huge amount of voice they simply consume huge amount of data networks bandwidth hence the cost goes up. </p>
<p>Following is a list of VoIP codec&rsquo;s along with how much data network bandwidth they consume. </p>
<p>* AMR Codec<br />
* BroadVoice Codec 16Kbps narrowband, and 32Kbps wideband<br />
* GIPS Family &#8211; 13.3 Kbps and up<br />
* GSM &#8211; 13 Kbps (full rate), 20ms frame size<br />
* iLBC &#8211; 15Kbps,20ms frame size: 13.3 Kbps, 30ms frame size<br />
* ITU G.711 &#8211; 64 Kbps, sample-based Also known as alaw/ulaw<br />
* ITU G.722 &#8211; 48/56/64 Kbps ADPCM 7Khz audio bandwidth<br />
* ITU G.722.1 &#8211; 24/32 Kbps 7Khz audio bandwidth (based on Polycom&#039;s SIREN codec)<br />
* ITU G.722.1C &#8211; 32 Kbps, a Polycom extension, 14Khz audio bandwidth<br />
* ITU G.722.2 &#8211; 6.6Kbps to 23.85Kbps. Also known as AMR-WB. CELP 7Khz audio bandwidth<br />
* ITU G.723.1 &#8211; 5.3/6.3 Kbps, 30ms frame size<br />
* ITU G.726 &#8211; 16/24/32/40 Kbps<br />
* ITU G.728 &#8211; 16 Kbps<br />
* ITU G.729 &#8211; 8 Kbps, 10ms frame size<br />
* Speex &#8211; 2.15 to 44.2 Kbps<br />
* LPC10 &#8211; 2.5 Kbps<br />
* DoD CELP &#8211; 4.8 Kbps </p>
<p>Switch to VoIP Today and you will never want to use traditional PSTN ever again. </p>
<p>Thanks </p>
<p>-Imran</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seamlessenterprise.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; VoIP is More than Plumbing</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/12/30/2008-the-year-that-voip-died/#comment-7414</link>
		<dc:creator>seamlessenterprise.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; VoIP is More than Plumbing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=4588#comment-7414</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Parrott made lots of good points in his blog entry about the VoIP-is-Dead Debate, but I’d like to focus on one comment in Om Malik’s original GigaOM posting quoting Alec Saunders on VoIP. Saunders characterized VoIP this way: “Voice over IP is just a transport and signaling technology. It’s plumbing.” [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve Parrott made lots of good points in his blog entry about the VoIP-is-Dead Debate, but I’d like to focus on one comment in Om Malik’s original GigaOM posting quoting Alec Saunders on VoIP. Saunders characterized VoIP this way: “Voice over IP is just a transport and signaling technology. It’s plumbing.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seamlessenterprise.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; VoIP’s Death Debate is Missing the Point</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/12/30/2008-the-year-that-voip-died/#comment-7413</link>
		<dc:creator>seamlessenterprise.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; VoIP’s Death Debate is Missing the Point</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=4588#comment-7413</guid>
		<description>[...] blogosphere has been buzzing about whether VoIP is dead, ever since Alec Saunders posted 2008: The Year that VoIP died on his blog, which lead to other posts, including a post by Om Malik on his GigaOM blog. Each has [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogosphere has been buzzing about whether VoIP is dead, ever since Alec Saunders posted 2008: The Year that VoIP died on his blog, which lead to other posts, including a post by Om Malik on his GigaOM blog. Each has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beau Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/12/30/2008-the-year-that-voip-died/#comment-7412</link>
		<dc:creator>Beau Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=4588#comment-7412</guid>
		<description>We tried them all Vonage, Skype, etc., the quality sucked and faxing became a nightmare. Our company switched to www.compoint.com for direct dial long distance at very low rates, with true one second billing, which surprisingly saves another 10%. There is no connect fee or monthly fee. We&#039;re done with VOIP until someone offers a truly integrated universal solution that&#039;s affordable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We tried them all Vonage, Skype, etc., the quality sucked and faxing became a nightmare. Our company switched to <a href="http://www.compoint.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.compoint.com</a> for direct dial long distance at very low rates, with true one second billing, which surprisingly saves another 10%. There is no connect fee or monthly fee. We&#8217;re done with VOIP until someone offers a truly integrated universal solution that&#8217;s affordable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graves On SOHO VoIP &#187; Can You Hear Me Now? VoIP Bloggers Decide: VoIP Undead!</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/12/30/2008-the-year-that-voip-died/#comment-7411</link>
		<dc:creator>Graves On SOHO VoIP &#187; Can You Hear Me Now? VoIP Bloggers Decide: VoIP Undead!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=4588#comment-7411</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;VoIP is dead.&#8221; A great many have weighed in with opinion on the matter, including; Alec Saunders, Andy Abramson, Dan York*, Ken Camp, Jon Arnold, Irwin Lazar, Om Malik, Tom Keating, amongst [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;VoIP is dead.&#8221; A great many have weighed in with opinion on the matter, including; Alec Saunders, Andy Abramson, Dan York*, Ken Camp, Jon Arnold, Irwin Lazar, Om Malik, Tom Keating, amongst [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revolutionary Information Infrastructure Systems &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Define &#34;VoIP&#34; - and then we can debate whether it is dead!</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/12/30/2008-the-year-that-voip-died/#comment-7410</link>
		<dc:creator>Revolutionary Information Infrastructure Systems &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Define &#34;VoIP&#34; - and then we can debate whether it is dead!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=4588#comment-7410</guid>
		<description>[...] dead&#8221; debate continuing to rage across the VoIP/communications part of the blogosphere (see Alec Saunders part 1 and part 2, Jon Arnold, Andy Abramson, Ken Camp, Jeff Pulver part 1 and part 2, Om Malik, Shidan [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dead&#8221; debate continuing to rage across the VoIP/communications part of the blogosphere (see Alec Saunders part 1 and part 2, Jon Arnold, Andy Abramson, Ken Camp, Jeff Pulver part 1 and part 2, Om Malik, Shidan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All we&#8217;re talking about is arbitrage &#8212; Alec Saunders SquawkBox</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/12/30/2008-the-year-that-voip-died/#comment-7409</link>
		<dc:creator>All we&#8217;re talking about is arbitrage &#8212; Alec Saunders SquawkBox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=4588#comment-7409</guid>
		<description>[...] the very deliberate italicization, which was in the original (you can read it at 2008: The Year that VoIP died.)&#160; You could make the points in that piece in another way – businesses which define [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the very deliberate italicization, which was in the original (you can read it at 2008: The Year that VoIP died.)&#160; You could make the points in that piece in another way – businesses which define [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emerging Tech Talk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Emerging Tech Talk #014 - Is VoIP dead? It depends&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/12/30/2008-the-year-that-voip-died/#comment-7408</link>
		<dc:creator>Emerging Tech Talk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Emerging Tech Talk #014 - Is VoIP dead? It depends&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=4588#comment-7408</guid>
		<description>[...] is percolating throughout the VoIP/communications part of the blogosphere. Alec Saunders says it is (and said so again). Jon Arnold says &#8220;it&#8217;s not dead yet&#8220;. Andy Abramson agrees [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is percolating throughout the VoIP/communications part of the blogosphere. Alec Saunders says it is (and said so again). Jon Arnold says &#8220;it&#8217;s not dead yet&#8220;. Andy Abramson agrees [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Tech</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/12/30/2008-the-year-that-voip-died/#comment-7407</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=4588#comment-7407</guid>
		<description>And it couldn&#039;t die fast enough. I know I&#039;m a dinosaur, providing copper dial tone for over 30 years, and my company is now urging customers to bundle their television services with VOIP, but the inherent fact is..... the quality sucks! Believe me, I&#039;ve monitored many thousands of circuits, and the fact that consumers are settling for this crap blows me away. 
 
Of course much of this is due to the backlash against Ma Bell, and probably some of this is warranted. However, they are like teenagers rebelling against their parents, cutting off their noses to spite their faces. Constantly changing providers, hoping for better service, when in reality they, like some other obnoxious ISP advertises; are all connecting to the same Internet. 
 
I must be getting older, because I&#039;m coming to realize that just because something is technologically feasible, doesn&#039;t mean that is better, or even a good thing. 
 
I feel better, now. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it couldn&#039;t die fast enough. I know I&#039;m a dinosaur, providing copper dial tone for over 30 years, and my company is now urging customers to bundle their television services with VOIP, but the inherent fact is&#8230;.. the quality sucks! Believe me, I&#039;ve monitored many thousands of circuits, and the fact that consumers are settling for this crap blows me away. </p>
<p>Of course much of this is due to the backlash against Ma Bell, and probably some of this is warranted. However, they are like teenagers rebelling against their parents, cutting off their noses to spite their faces. Constantly changing providers, hoping for better service, when in reality they, like some other obnoxious ISP advertises; are all connecting to the same Internet. </p>
<p>I must be getting older, because I&#039;m coming to realize that just because something is technologically feasible, doesn&#039;t mean that is better, or even a good thing. </p>
<p>I feel better, now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

