<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Squawk Box June 16</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/06/16/squawk-box-june-16/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/06/16/squawk-box-june-16/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=squawk-box-june-16</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Counsel</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/06/16/squawk-box-june-16/#comment-6901</link>
		<dc:creator>Counsel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=4133#comment-6901</guid>
		<description>I have to love the &quot;gumption&quot; of the AP on this note.  There is a wide body of law describing what is and what is not &quot;fair use&quot; under the Copyright Law. 
 
I have a post on my site that describes the basic outline of what the U.S.A. government says is &quot;fair use.&quot; 
 
While some blogs do quote whole stories (shame on you...), many simply post quotes from the article and give a link (cite) to the information. 
 
The former is much more likely to fail one of the 4-prongs the courts will look at when determining whether your use is &quot;fair use&quot; while the latter is likely to not fail that prong. 
 
One quote from that government page 
 
 
Copyright protects the particular way an author has expressed himself; it does not extend to any ideas, systems, or factual information conveyed in the work. 
 
 
Educate yourselves so that we can all protect our legal rights (yours, mine, the APs...). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to love the &quot;gumption&quot; of the AP on this note.  There is a wide body of law describing what is and what is not &quot;fair use&quot; under the Copyright Law. </p>
<p>I have a post on my site that describes the basic outline of what the U.S.A. government says is &quot;fair use.&quot; </p>
<p>While some blogs do quote whole stories (shame on you&#8230;), many simply post quotes from the article and give a link (cite) to the information. </p>
<p>The former is much more likely to fail one of the 4-prongs the courts will look at when determining whether your use is &quot;fair use&quot; while the latter is likely to not fail that prong. </p>
<p>One quote from that government page </p>
<p>Copyright protects the particular way an author has expressed himself; it does not extend to any ideas, systems, or factual information conveyed in the work. </p>
<p>Educate yourselves so that we can all protect our legal rights (yours, mine, the APs&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

