<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two BSers BSing about Art and the Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/04/14/two-bsers-bsing-about-art-and-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/04/14/two-bsers-bsing-about-art-and-the-internet/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=two-bsers-bsing-about-art-and-the-internet</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Leroux</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/04/14/two-bsers-bsing-about-art-and-the-internet/#comment-6611</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Leroux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=3956#comment-6611</guid>
		<description>Actually, Jeanette touches on a point that anyone who publishes on the Internet must come to terms with: Do I try to stop people from appropriating my content or do I tacitly (or even explicitly) encourage them to &quot;steal&quot; it? Which option, in the long run, will be of greater benefit to me -- and to everyone else?

There&#039;s no obvious answer to the question, but you have to assume that some of your content will always be &quot;stolen.&quot; So one strategy is to publish “stealable” content in ways that will create demand for more of your content. For instance, some people will make a chapter from their how-to book  freely available on the web -- and thereby create a greater demand for the entire book. That said, it&#039;s always a challenge to determine how much you should keep and how much you should give away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Jeanette touches on a point that anyone who publishes on the Internet must come to terms with: Do I try to stop people from appropriating my content or do I tacitly (or even explicitly) encourage them to &#8220;steal&#8221; it? Which option, in the long run, will be of greater benefit to me &#8212; and to everyone else?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no obvious answer to the question, but you have to assume that some of your content will always be &#8220;stolen.&#8221; So one strategy is to publish “stealable” content in ways that will create demand for more of your content. For instance, some people will make a chapter from their how-to book  freely available on the web &#8212; and thereby create a greater demand for the entire book. That said, it&#8217;s always a challenge to determine how much you should keep and how much you should give away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/04/14/two-bsers-bsing-about-art-and-the-internet/#comment-6612</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=3956#comment-6612</guid>
		<description>Paul - that&#039;s the reason I chose a creative commons attribute / non-commercial license for this site.  At minimum I&#039;m declaring to anyone who reads the license that they may repurpose this content for their own use, provided it is non-commercial and they give me credit. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul &#8211; that&#039;s the reason I chose a creative commons attribute / non-commercial license for this site.  At minimum I&#039;m declaring to anyone who reads the license that they may repurpose this content for their own use, provided it is non-commercial and they give me credit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/04/14/two-bsers-bsing-about-art-and-the-internet/#comment-6610</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=3956#comment-6610</guid>
		<description>A very good point, Jeanette. Very good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very good point, Jeanette. Very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanette</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/04/14/two-bsers-bsing-about-art-and-the-internet/#comment-6609</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=3956#comment-6609</guid>
		<description>As an author, I could make a case that authors should get a share of tax for people sharing ebooks and articles that they illegally share. Also, I see my photographs used by others without my permission. I don&#039;t see how an Internet tax could be regulated. 
 
Joy~ 
 
Jeanette </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an author, I could make a case that authors should get a share of tax for people sharing ebooks and articles that they illegally share. Also, I see my photographs used by others without my permission. I don&#039;t see how an Internet tax could be regulated. </p>
<p>Joy~ </p>
<p>Jeanette</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Leroux</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/04/14/two-bsers-bsing-about-art-and-the-internet/#comment-6608</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Leroux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/?p=3956#comment-6608</guid>
		<description>I find the notion that &quot;all Internet users should pay the freight&quot; inherently repugnant. It&#039;s my money, I earned it, and I should have the freedom to decide which artists will benefit from it. For the same reason, I dislike private copy levies that distribute my money to artists whom I don&#039;t wish to support. 
 
Not that I have strong feelings about this or anything... :-) 
 
- Paul </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the notion that &quot;all Internet users should pay the freight&quot; inherently repugnant. It&#039;s my money, I earned it, and I should have the freedom to decide which artists will benefit from it. For the same reason, I dislike private copy levies that distribute my money to artists whom I don&#039;t wish to support. </p>
<p>Not that I have strong feelings about this or anything&#8230; <img src='http://www.saunderslog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>- Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

