<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Squawk Box March 24</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/03/24/squawk-box-march-24/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/03/24/squawk-box-march-24/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=squawk-box-march-24</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnThinnai Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OpenID Providers that Don&#8217;t Consume are not Evil</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/03/24/squawk-box-march-24/#comment-6460</link>
		<dc:creator>EnThinnai Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OpenID Providers that Don&#8217;t Consume are not Evil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2008/03/24/squawk-box-march-24/#comment-6460</guid>
		<description>[...] not accept from others. It is not even detrimental to wider adoption of OpenID. Just this morning Alec Saunders (most assuredly a friend and a well wisher) discussed Michael’s post in his daily Sqwakbox. There [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not accept from others. It is not even detrimental to wider adoption of OpenID. Just this morning Alec Saunders (most assuredly a friend and a well wisher) discussed Michael’s post in his daily Sqwakbox. There [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disruptive Conversations</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2008/03/24/squawk-box-march-24/#comment-6459</link>
		<dc:creator>Disruptive Conversations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2008/03/24/squawk-box-march-24/#comment-6459</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;TechCrunch: Is OpenID being exploited for PR purposes by the &quot;Big Internet Companies&quot;?&lt;/strong&gt;

Are the Big Internet Companies (AOL, Google, Yahoo, Microsoft) really committed to OpenID or are they merely exploiting it for PR purposes? That&#039;s the question Mike Arrington asks today over on TechCrunch. When I last wrote about OpenID back in</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>TechCrunch: Is OpenID being exploited for PR purposes by the &#8220;Big Internet Companies&#8221;?</strong></p>
<p>Are the Big Internet Companies (AOL, Google, Yahoo, Microsoft) really committed to OpenID or are they merely exploiting it for PR purposes? That&#8217;s the question Mike Arrington asks today over on TechCrunch. When I last wrote about OpenID back in</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

