<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How I spent just $4.16 on mobile calls at VON</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Access Truphone Anywhere &#8212; Alec Saunders SquawkBox</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5677</link>
		<dc:creator>Access Truphone Anywhere &#8212; Alec Saunders SquawkBox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5677</guid>
		<description>[...] address one of the last remaining flaws in Truphone&#8217;s offering. Currently, when I travel, I use both Truphone and Mobivox. Mobivox allows me to make outbound calls cheaply, and I use Truphone for all incoming calls and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] address one of the last remaining flaws in Truphone&#8217;s offering. Currently, when I travel, I use both Truphone and Mobivox. Mobivox allows me to make outbound calls cheaply, and I use Truphone for all incoming calls and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Wifimobile again outsmarted by Truphone&#8217;s free offer&#160;by&#160;Laigoo - All In One</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5676</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Wifimobile again outsmarted by Truphone&#8217;s free offer&#160;by&#160;Laigoo - All In One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5676</guid>
		<description>[...] and goes prepay like Truphone. The move is said to be inspired by a blog post from iotum&#8217;s Alec Saunders from Canada who managed to spend just $4.16 on mobile calls and roaming at the IP industry event [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and goes prepay like Truphone. The move is said to be inspired by a blog post from iotum&#8217;s Alec Saunders from Canada who managed to spend just $4.16 on mobile calls and roaming at the IP industry event [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roaming On The Cheap In The US : wpdaily.net</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5675</link>
		<dc:creator>Roaming On The Cheap In The US : wpdaily.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5675</guid>
		<description>[...] away with being in the US for a trade show, yet manage to only spend $4.16 on calls? Alec Saunders chronicled his experience in doing so when he attended the VON conference in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] away with being in the US for a trade show, yet manage to only spend $4.16 on calls? Alec Saunders chronicled his experience in doing so when he attended the VON conference in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5674</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5674</guid>
		<description>It really didn&#039;t cost them much at all John. 
 
My family has an unlimited North American calling plan from Bell Canada.  It cost nothing more to call Truphone&#039;s 360 number versus my cell phone. 
 
My office pays .02 / minute for North American dialing, wherever they call. Again, no difference for them. 
 
The one person who did pay extra is  has a Canada only long distance plan on his cell phone. 
 
And yes, having a combined GSM / WiFi number would have rocked.  Truphone almost gives you that. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really didn&#039;t cost them much at all John. </p>
<p>My family has an unlimited North American calling plan from Bell Canada.  It cost nothing more to call Truphone&#039;s 360 number versus my cell phone. </p>
<p>My office pays .02 / minute for North American dialing, wherever they call. Again, no difference for them. </p>
<p>The one person who did pay extra is  has a Canada only long distance plan on his cell phone. </p>
<p>And yes, having a combined GSM / WiFi number would have rocked.  Truphone almost gives you that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John O&#039;Prey</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5673</link>
		<dc:creator>John O&#039;Prey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5673</guid>
		<description>Hi Alec, 
 
Very good article and sounds like you saved yourself a bundle. That is great for you but how much did it cost your friends at home calling you on the Truphone number? 
 
Also wouldn&#039;t it be great if you could combine the Wi-Fi calls and GSM access numbers into one account? 
 
John O&#039;Prey 
WiFiMobile </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alec, </p>
<p>Very good article and sounds like you saved yourself a bundle. That is great for you but how much did it cost your friends at home calling you on the Truphone number? </p>
<p>Also wouldn&#039;t it be great if you could combine the Wi-Fi calls and GSM access numbers into one account? </p>
<p>John O&#039;Prey<br />
WiFiMobile</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5672</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5672</guid>
		<description>I think we&#039;ll just have to wait until competing pipes become more mainstream ala wimax/wibro. Anything carried on the cellular pipe is subject to anti-competitive practices from the incumbents, at least in the states. Look at how slow they are to deploy 3G. And as it is, they do traffic-shaping. And I don&#039;t see this non-net-neutral policy going away either until the incumbents are seriously challenged by cheap and stable interoperable data carriage offered via some other channel. Let&#039;s hope that day is soon. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we&#039;ll just have to wait until competing pipes become more mainstream ala wimax/wibro. Anything carried on the cellular pipe is subject to anti-competitive practices from the incumbents, at least in the states. Look at how slow they are to deploy 3G. And as it is, they do traffic-shaping. And I don&#039;t see this non-net-neutral policy going away either until the incumbents are seriously challenged by cheap and stable interoperable data carriage offered via some other channel. Let&#039;s hope that day is soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5671</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5671</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, this sounds a lot like T-mobile&#039;s @home UMA offering. The pro of that service is the seamless integration/hand-off of cell to wifi and vice versa. The con (apart from the currently limited number of UMA phones) is that they still control pricing (e.g. out-of-network cellular roaming, etc). 
 
Your BYO solution gives you more control over price (sim exchange, etc) but makes the cascade integration less seamless. I don&#039;t think you can get the kind of seamlessness that uma offers without having hooks to all technologies involved (everyone has a hook to wifi/internet, but not to cellular). Cellular bandwidth is basically a cartel-controlled commodity in the states. The barriers to entry are simply to high. The 10 cents/min you&#039;re paying to cingular is an artifact of this. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, this sounds a lot like T-mobile&#039;s @home UMA offering. The pro of that service is the seamless integration/hand-off of cell to wifi and vice versa. The con (apart from the currently limited number of UMA phones) is that they still control pricing (e.g. out-of-network cellular roaming, etc). </p>
<p>Your BYO solution gives you more control over price (sim exchange, etc) but makes the cascade integration less seamless. I don&#039;t think you can get the kind of seamlessness that uma offers without having hooks to all technologies involved (everyone has a hook to wifi/internet, but not to cellular). Cellular bandwidth is basically a cartel-controlled commodity in the states. The barriers to entry are simply to high. The 10 cents/min you&#039;re paying to cingular is an artifact of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5670</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 08:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5670</guid>
		<description>Hey Bob -- you&#039;re correct.  Truphone lets you receive calls via cellular when you aren&#039;t in a WiFi zone.  It simply forwards the call to the Cingular number.  One of the very nice features they&#039;ve built is to automatically detect the SIM change, and change the forwarding number for you that way. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bob &#8212; you&#039;re correct.  Truphone lets you receive calls via cellular when you aren&#039;t in a WiFi zone.  It simply forwards the call to the Cingular number.  One of the very nice features they&#039;ve built is to automatically detect the SIM change, and change the forwarding number for you that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5669</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 06:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5669</guid>
		<description>Why did Truphone care about your sim card? Its only requirement is wifi access.

Which leads me to my next question: if you were out of wifi range, you didn&#039;t get incoming Truphone calls, correct? (unless they were forwarded to you cingular number, which costs 10 cents/min)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did Truphone care about your sim card? Its only requirement is wifi access.</p>
<p>Which leads me to my next question: if you were out of wifi range, you didn&#8217;t get incoming Truphone calls, correct? (unless they were forwarded to you cingular number, which costs 10 cents/min)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shai Berger</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5668</link>
		<dc:creator>Shai Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 12:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/11/02/how-i-spent-just-416-on-mobile-calls-at-von/#comment-5668</guid>
		<description>Awesome. Thanks for the tips. 
 
I&#039;m still trying to do all my calling through Skype on my notebook over WiFi. I got the SkypeOut flat rate during their promotion for $15/year (normally $30/year). 
 
Works ok since I had WifI at both the hotel and the conference. But it&#039;s annoying to tell incoming callers that I will call them back. 
 
- Shai </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. Thanks for the tips. </p>
<p>I&#039;m still trying to do all my calling through Skype on my notebook over WiFi. I got the SkypeOut flat rate during their promotion for $15/year (normally $30/year). </p>
<p>Works ok since I had WifI at both the hotel and the conference. But it&#039;s annoying to tell incoming callers that I will call them back. </p>
<p>- Shai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

