<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise 2.0 Reflections: We&#8217;re onto something BIG!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/06/20/enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/06/20/enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Being a Skype Software Business Solution Partner : voiceontheweb.biz</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/06/20/enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big/#comment-5119</link>
		<dc:creator>On Being a Skype Software Business Solution Partner : voiceontheweb.biz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/06/20/enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big/#comment-5119</guid>
		<description>[...] Alec Saunders’ Enterprise 2.0 Reflections: We’re onto something [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alec Saunders’ Enterprise 2.0 Reflections: We’re onto something [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/06/20/enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big/#comment-5118</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/06/20/enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big/#comment-5118</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ken.  That&#039;s a nice piece. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ken.  That&#039;s a nice piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/06/20/enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big/#comment-5117</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/06/20/enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big/#comment-5117</guid>
		<description>One of the manufacturing guys over at Evolving Excellence came to similar conclusions about information overload while thinking about the bizarre regulatory/demand situation that created corn overproduction. 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.evolvingexcellence.com/blog/2007/07/the-obesity-epi.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.evolvingexcellence.com/blog/2007/07/th...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
Ken </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the manufacturing guys over at Evolving Excellence came to similar conclusions about information overload while thinking about the bizarre regulatory/demand situation that created corn overproduction.<br />
  <a href="http://www.evolvingexcellence.com/blog/2007/07/the-obesity-epi.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.evolvingexcellence.com/blog/2007/07/th&#8230;</a> </p>
<p>Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "Smart posts by smart people about Enterprise 2.0" from Pro PR</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/06/20/enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big/#comment-5116</link>
		<dc:creator>"Smart posts by smart people about Enterprise 2.0" from Pro PR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/06/20/enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big/#comment-5116</guid>
		<description>[...] Saunders offers reflects on what&#8217;s really going on with Enterprise 2.0. And he thinks it&#8217;s something [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Saunders offers reflects on what&#8217;s really going on with Enterprise 2.0. And he thinks it&#8217;s something [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/06/20/enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big/#comment-5115</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/06/20/enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big/#comment-5115</guid>
		<description>Hi Frank, 
 
Thanks for the clarification.  I&#039;ve been doing the same thing as you, running informal Facebook polls to see what information I can gather.  I am fairly convinced, at this point, that Facebook, IF THEY WANT TO, have a winner in Enterprise. 
 
A </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Frank, </p>
<p>Thanks for the clarification.  I&#039;ve been doing the same thing as you, running informal Facebook polls to see what information I can gather.  I am fairly convinced, at this point, that Facebook, IF THEY WANT TO, have a winner in Enterprise. </p>
<p>A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Gilbane</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/06/20/enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big/#comment-5114</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Gilbane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/06/20/enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big/#comment-5114</guid>
		<description>Hello Alec and Russ: 
 
The only session I participated in at our Washington conference was the opening panel, so I don&#039;t know what others might have said in other conference sessions. In case it was my remarks you are referring to, let me clarify. What I said was that the term &quot;Web 2.0&quot; was &quot;irritating&quot;, and that while the technologies and concepts often meant to be included were useful and important, the attempt incorporate them all into a neat little buzzphrase is not very helpful to organizations trying to figure out how to build or buy modern web applications. I brought up &quot;Enterprise 2.0&quot; and said there was a lot of useful discussion around it, and attempted to recommend Andrew McAfee&#039;s blog but couldn&#039;t remembe his name at the time. We were the first conference I know of to cover enterprise blogs and wikis and RSS and have been covering them for 3 years, and our report published in March 2005 was certainly one of, if not the first, to talk about how enterprises were actually using these technologies. If you go to gilbane.com and also look around on our conference pages and blogs you will get a better idea of what we really think. 
 
I have also been at the Enterprise 2.0 conference (which we sponsor BTW) and it has been pretty good. At the risk of providing more evidence that I am somehow against newer technologies, check out the results of the facebook poll I conducted this week &quot;Facebook Generation on Enterprise 2.0 Collaboration Technologies&quot; at &lt;a href=&quot;http://gilbane.com/blog/2007/06/facebook_generation_on_enterpr.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://gilbane.com/blog/2007/06/facebook_generati...&lt;/a&gt;. Obviously this is only an informal poll, but hearing what 1000 Facebook users think is fascinating. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Alec and Russ: </p>
<p>The only session I participated in at our Washington conference was the opening panel, so I don&#039;t know what others might have said in other conference sessions. In case it was my remarks you are referring to, let me clarify. What I said was that the term &quot;Web 2.0&quot; was &quot;irritating&quot;, and that while the technologies and concepts often meant to be included were useful and important, the attempt incorporate them all into a neat little buzzphrase is not very helpful to organizations trying to figure out how to build or buy modern web applications. I brought up &quot;Enterprise 2.0&quot; and said there was a lot of useful discussion around it, and attempted to recommend Andrew McAfee&#039;s blog but couldn&#039;t remembe his name at the time. We were the first conference I know of to cover enterprise blogs and wikis and RSS and have been covering them for 3 years, and our report published in March 2005 was certainly one of, if not the first, to talk about how enterprises were actually using these technologies. If you go to gilbane.com and also look around on our conference pages and blogs you will get a better idea of what we really think. </p>
<p>I have also been at the Enterprise 2.0 conference (which we sponsor BTW) and it has been pretty good. At the risk of providing more evidence that I am somehow against newer technologies, check out the results of the facebook poll I conducted this week &quot;Facebook Generation on Enterprise 2.0 Collaboration Technologies&quot; at <a href="http://gilbane.com/blog/2007/06/facebook_generation_on_enterpr.html" rel="nofollow">http://gilbane.com/blog/2007/06/facebook_generati&#8230;</a>. Obviously this is only an informal poll, but hearing what 1000 Facebook users think is fascinating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/06/20/enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big/#comment-5113</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/06/20/enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big/#comment-5113</guid>
		<description>Hi Russ!  I think there is a certain amount of hyperbole at this stage, and it&#039;s likely unavoidable.  We&#039;re probably going to go through a period where everyone tries to use the Enterprise 2.0 hammer for every problem, and along the way we&#039;ll learn some things.  I think dismissing it, as the folks at Gilbane apparently did, is putting your head in the sand.  These technologies are here to stay. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Russ!  I think there is a certain amount of hyperbole at this stage, and it&#039;s likely unavoidable.  We&#039;re probably going to go through a period where everyone tries to use the Enterprise 2.0 hammer for every problem, and along the way we&#039;ll learn some things.  I think dismissing it, as the folks at Gilbane apparently did, is putting your head in the sand.  These technologies are here to stay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russ stalters</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/06/20/enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big/#comment-5112</link>
		<dc:creator>russ stalters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/06/20/enterprise-20-reflections-were-onto-something-big/#comment-5112</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great insights from the conference. I wished I could have made it. Maybe next year. I just spoke at the Gilbane Confenernce on DC a couple of weeks ago and many of the analysts and speakers at the conference dismissed Enterprise 2.0 as just hyperbole. 
 
I think they are wrong. I agree with you. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great insights from the conference. I wished I could have made it. Maybe next year. I just spoke at the Gilbane Confenernce on DC a couple of weeks ago and many of the analysts and speakers at the conference dismissed Enterprise 2.0 as just hyperbole. </p>
<p>I think they are wrong. I agree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

