<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The e911 conundrum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/06/05/the-e911-conundrum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/06/05/the-e911-conundrum/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-e911-conundrum</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/06/05/the-e911-conundrum/#comment-5069</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/06/05/the-e911-conundrum/#comment-5069</guid>
		<description>Agree 100%.  The current debate is loopy, Aswath. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree 100%.  The current debate is loopy, Aswath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aswath</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/06/05/the-e911-conundrum/#comment-5068</link>
		<dc:creator>Aswath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/06/05/the-e911-conundrum/#comment-5068</guid>
		<description>I have made the following point earlier: the fundamental problem is in the tacit assumption that E911 service is a &quot;voice&quot; service and then we are trying to extend it to VoIP. Instead we should consider E911 service is part of &quot;access to PSTN&quot; service (after all E911 is available in the Fax line as well) and so we should extend it to &quot;Internet access&quot; service. If we do that, then as you observe, wireline access providers can offer location service to PSAPs. We need to solve wireless access providers, just like we had to do in the wireless PSTN. 
 
There is an additional benefit in doing this - as end points and PSAPs evolve, E911 can be more than just &quot;voice&quot; application. One can connect medical monitoring devices , for example. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have made the following point earlier: the fundamental problem is in the tacit assumption that E911 service is a &quot;voice&quot; service and then we are trying to extend it to VoIP. Instead we should consider E911 service is part of &quot;access to PSTN&quot; service (after all E911 is available in the Fax line as well) and so we should extend it to &quot;Internet access&quot; service. If we do that, then as you observe, wireline access providers can offer location service to PSAPs. We need to solve wireless access providers, just like we had to do in the wireless PSTN. </p>
<p>There is an additional benefit in doing this &#8211; as end points and PSAPs evolve, E911 can be more than just &quot;voice&quot; application. One can connect medical monitoring devices , for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

