<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel patents the softphone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/05/09/intel-patents-the-softphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/05/09/intel-patents-the-softphone/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=intel-patents-the-softphone</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alas4493</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/05/09/intel-patents-the-softphone/#comment-4905</link>
		<dc:creator>Alas4493</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 10:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/05/09/intel-patents-the-softphone/#comment-4905</guid>
		<description>This is nothing short of amazing and a clear indication that the US Patent Office is just, well, broken.  There were many softphones around before the year 2000, so there must be a ton of prior art.  Genesys Labs had one years before 2000, and so did most of the ACD manufacturers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nothing short of amazing and a clear indication that the US Patent Office is just, well, broken.  There were many softphones around before the year 2000, so there must be a ton of prior art.  Genesys Labs had one years before 2000, and so did most of the ACD manufacturers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Flat Planet and a Phone ! &#187; Behind the scenes of the Intel, Jajah deal</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/05/09/intel-patents-the-softphone/#comment-4904</link>
		<dc:creator>The Flat Planet and a Phone ! &#187; Behind the scenes of the Intel, Jajah deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 06:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/05/09/intel-patents-the-softphone/#comment-4904</guid>
		<description>[...] an added value to the Intel relationship that we did not see before, since Intel has recently been awarded a patent on a softphone. Jajah now has a weapon against Selex. Both developmentsÂ  worry me. Why was Intel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an added value to the Intel relationship that we did not see before, since Intel has recently been awarded a patent on a softphone. Jajah now has a weapon against Selex. Both developmentsÂ  worry me. Why was Intel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Voip Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More VoIP Patent Insanity</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/05/09/intel-patents-the-softphone/#comment-4903</link>
		<dc:creator>The Voip Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More VoIP Patent Insanity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 12:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/05/09/intel-patents-the-softphone/#comment-4903</guid>
		<description>[...] granting process has turned into a travesty. Well this is more of the same bulldoodoo: Intel was awarded a patent in late 2006, filed in 2000, that essentially sounds like dominion over any type of softphone. And [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] granting process has turned into a travesty. Well this is more of the same bulldoodoo: Intel was awarded a patent in late 2006, filed in 2000, that essentially sounds like dominion over any type of softphone. And [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Flat Planet and a Phone ! &#187; What will they patent next?</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/05/09/intel-patents-the-softphone/#comment-4902</link>
		<dc:creator>The Flat Planet and a Phone ! &#187; What will they patent next?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/05/09/intel-patents-the-softphone/#comment-4902</guid>
		<description>[...] we see Intel being awarded a patent for a softphone in 2006! I actually got an email from Larry who related how he was involved in development of a softphone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we see Intel being awarded a patent for a softphone in 2006! I actually got an email from Larry who related how he was involved in development of a softphone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Intel&#8217;s funding of Jajah hurt other players at Roam4free</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/05/09/intel-patents-the-softphone/#comment-4900</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Intel&#8217;s funding of Jajah hurt other players at Roam4free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 18:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/05/09/intel-patents-the-softphone/#comment-4900</guid>
		<description>[...] holds patents over the softphone and it may be interesting to see how Intel goes after anyone who in their opinion who is in breach [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] holds patents over the softphone and it may be interesting to see how Intel goes after anyone who in their opinion who is in breach [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Childs</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/05/09/intel-patents-the-softphone/#comment-4901</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Childs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 18:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/05/09/intel-patents-the-softphone/#comment-4901</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the claims that matter - though the abstract is usually an indication of the breadth of the claims and this seems broad. 
 
And what do you make of the approval cycle - 6 years seems long. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s the claims that matter &#8211; though the abstract is usually an indication of the breadth of the claims and this seems broad. </p>
<p>And what do you make of the approval cycle &#8211; 6 years seems long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

