<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Incremental business models vs. disruptive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/04/16/incremental-business-models-vs-disruptive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/04/16/incremental-business-models-vs-disruptive/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=incremental-business-models-vs-disruptive</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoIP User</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/04/16/incremental-business-models-vs-disruptive/#comment-4811</link>
		<dc:creator>VoIP User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/04/16/incremental-business-models-vs-disruptive/#comment-4811</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Vonage : &quot;We have no work-around&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;

The judge does have the \&quot;public interest\&quot; hook to hang a stay on (and 2 million subscribers validates the public nature of this legal process) but beyond that temporary legal respite, Vonage are going to have to do something to stay alive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Vonage : &#8220;We have no work-around&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>The judge does have the \&#8221;public interest\&#8221; hook to hang a stay on (and 2 million subscribers validates the public nature of this legal process) but beyond that temporary legal respite, Vonage are going to have to do something to stay alive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/04/16/incremental-business-models-vs-disruptive/#comment-4812</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/04/16/incremental-business-models-vs-disruptive/#comment-4812</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s a tenuous argument.  Arguably, the public interest is served if they can continue to service their existing customers.  I&#039;d imagine they could be profitable with a reduction in marketing expenditures, also.  Which would imply to me that if they want to grow they either have to license Verizon&#039;s tech, or find a workaround.  My bet&#039;s on the license. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#039;s a tenuous argument.  Arguably, the public interest is served if they can continue to service their existing customers.  I&#039;d imagine they could be profitable with a reduction in marketing expenditures, also.  Which would imply to me that if they want to grow they either have to license Verizon&#039;s tech, or find a workaround.  My bet&#039;s on the license.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

