<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T: A latter day Standard Oil?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/04/09/att-a-latter-day-standard-oil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/04/09/att-a-latter-day-standard-oil/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=att-a-latter-day-standard-oil</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; Iowa Telcos get date with FCC</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/04/09/att-a-latter-day-standard-oil/#comment-4760</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM &#187; Iowa Telcos get date with FCC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/04/09/att-a-latter-day-standard-oil/#comment-4760</guid>
		<description>[...] asked how he thought the 11-employee strong Great Lakes might fare against a business and legal behemoth like AT&amp;T, Nelson said that legal precedent, as well as current regulations, were on his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] asked how he thought the 11-employee strong Great Lakes might fare against a business and legal behemoth like AT&amp;T, Nelson said that legal precedent, as well as current regulations, were on his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: House on a Red Corner &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-04-10</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/04/09/att-a-latter-day-standard-oil/#comment-4759</link>
		<dc:creator>House on a Red Corner &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-04-10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/04/09/att-a-latter-day-standard-oil/#comment-4759</guid>
		<description>[...] AT&amp;T: A latter day Standard Oil? It is very interesting to see that incumbents are intent on bending the law in order to prevent having to change their business model in response to market changes. (tags: bully attt telephone voip business) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AT&#38;T: A latter day Standard Oil? It is very interesting to see that incumbents are intent on bending the law in order to prevent having to change their business model in response to market changes. (tags: bully attt telephone voip business) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/04/09/att-a-latter-day-standard-oil/#comment-4758</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/04/09/att-a-latter-day-standard-oil/#comment-4758</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a net neutrality issue.  Their conduct is flat out illegal, it appears to me. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a net neutrality issue.  Their conduct is flat out illegal, it appears to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Childs</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/04/09/att-a-latter-day-standard-oil/#comment-4757</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Childs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/04/09/att-a-latter-day-standard-oil/#comment-4757</guid>
		<description>Is this also a harbinger of a world where Net Neutrality doesn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t exist? 
 
Sites arbitrarily shut down or intermittently blocked, disinformation masquerading customer service and hundreds of thousands of &#226;&#8364;&#732;service providers&#226;&#8364;&#8482; without the cash or pluck of Iowa telco&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s to be goaded due to their &#226;&#8364;&#732;access&#226;&#8364;&#8482; arrangements. 
 
If this can happen to small companies in a regulated market &#226;&#8364;&#8220; imaging what could happen if Telco&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s can treat web traffic the way they want &#226;&#8364;&#8220; instead of equally. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this also a harbinger of a world where Net Neutrality doesn&acirc;&euro;&trade;t exist? </p>
<p>Sites arbitrarily shut down or intermittently blocked, disinformation masquerading customer service and hundreds of thousands of &acirc;&euro;&tilde;service providers&acirc;&euro;&trade; without the cash or pluck of Iowa telco&acirc;&euro;&trade;s to be goaded due to their &acirc;&euro;&tilde;access&acirc;&euro;&trade; arrangements. </p>
<p>If this can happen to small companies in a regulated market &acirc;&euro;&ldquo; imaging what could happen if Telco&acirc;&euro;&trade;s can treat web traffic the way they want &acirc;&euro;&ldquo; instead of equally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T: Free calls may cost $250 M&#160;&#187;&#160;TechAddress</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/04/09/att-a-latter-day-standard-oil/#comment-4756</link>
		<dc:creator>AT&#38;T: Free calls may cost $250 M&#160;&#187;&#160;TechAddress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/04/09/att-a-latter-day-standard-oil/#comment-4756</guid>
		<description>[...] However, AT&amp;T&#8217;s decision to appeal directly to Martin and the FCC may be a sign that Ma Bell&#8217;s earlier legal forays may not win the day. Certainly, the Internet companies (like free international caller Futurephone) and Iowa telcos are getting bolder of late, returning to make public statements and filing lawsuits of their own, after initially staying silent in the face of AT&amp;T&#8217;s legal might (which some call outright bullying). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, AT&amp;T&#8217;s decision to appeal directly to Martin and the FCC may be a sign that Ma Bell&#8217;s earlier legal forays may not win the day. Certainly, the Internet companies (like free international caller Futurephone) and Iowa telcos are getting bolder of late, returning to make public statements and filing lawsuits of their own, after initially staying silent in the face of AT&amp;T&#8217;s legal might (which some call outright bullying). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; AT&#38;T: Free calls may cost $250 M</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/04/09/att-a-latter-day-standard-oil/#comment-4755</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM &#187; AT&#38;T: Free calls may cost $250 M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/04/09/att-a-latter-day-standard-oil/#comment-4755</guid>
		<description>[...] However, AT&amp;T&#8217;s decision to appeal directly to Martin and the FCC may be a sign that Ma Bell&#8217;s earlier legal forays may not win the day. Certainly, the Internet companies (like free international caller Futurephone) and Iowa telcos are getting bolder of late, returning to make public statements and filing lawsuits of their own, after initially staying silent in the face of AT&amp;T&#8217;s legal might (which some call outright bullying). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, AT&amp;T&#8217;s decision to appeal directly to Martin and the FCC may be a sign that Ma Bell&#8217;s earlier legal forays may not win the day. Certainly, the Internet companies (like free international caller Futurephone) and Iowa telcos are getting bolder of late, returning to make public statements and filing lawsuits of their own, after initially staying silent in the face of AT&amp;T&#8217;s legal might (which some call outright bullying). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Neighbourhoods</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/04/09/att-a-latter-day-standard-oil/#comment-4754</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Neighbourhoods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 14:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/04/09/att-a-latter-day-standard-oil/#comment-4754</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ATT Tries Dwarf Stomping in Iowa&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ATT Tries Dwarf Stomping in Iowa</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

