http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/02/04/voice-20-and-bouillabaisse/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=voice-20-and-bouillabaisse An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog. Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/02/04/voice-20-and-bouillabaisse/#comment-4441 Moshe Maeir Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:11:40 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2007/02/04/voice-20-and-bouillabaisse/#comment-4441 IMHO there is no such thing as Voice 2.0. Saying so assumes that one we are building on Voice 1.0 and two, voice communications differ from other kinds of communications. We actually should use the term CoIP (Communications or Collaborations over IP) which expresses our future communications better. I elaborate on this in my blog athttp://flatplanetphone.com/wordpress/?p=38 IMHO there is no such thing as Voice 2.0. Saying so assumes that one we are building on Voice 1.0 and two, voice communications differ from other kinds of communications. We actually should use the term CoIP (Communications or Collaborations over IP) which expresses our future communications better. I elaborate on this in my blog athttp://flatplanetphone.com/wordpress/?p=38

]]> http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/02/04/voice-20-and-bouillabaisse/#comment-4440 The Flat Planet and a Phone ! » Blog Archive » VoIP is Dead! Long Live CoIP! Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:07:33 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2007/02/04/voice-20-and-bouillabaisse/#comment-4440 [...] There is an ongoing discussion by leading bloggers where are the Voice 2.o applications. Jeff, Tom, Alec, Mr. Blog, Aswath have all weighed in. While it took me a day or so to digest their comments - I think that I don’t understand what they are talking about. There is really no such thing as Voice 1.0, Voice 2.0 or even Voice3.0… [...] [...] There is an ongoing discussion by leading bloggers where are the Voice 2.o applications. Jeff, Tom, Alec, Mr. Blog, Aswath have all weighed in. While it took me a day or so to digest their comments – I think that I don’t understand what they are talking about. There is really no such thing as Voice 1.0, Voice 2.0 or even Voice3.0… [...]

]]> http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/02/04/voice-20-and-bouillabaisse/#comment-4439 Alec Mon, 05 Feb 2007 18:15:34 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2007/02/04/voice-20-and-bouillabaisse/#comment-4439 Indeed. I was very surprised by the result. Indeed. I was very surprised by the result.

]]> http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/02/04/voice-20-and-bouillabaisse/#comment-4438 Paul Sweeney Mon, 05 Feb 2007 10:56:24 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2007/02/04/voice-20-and-bouillabaisse/#comment-4438 Great Post. And Interesting to hear about the "availability of self" and "availability of others" from a presence perspective. Maybe that's because we unconsciously order our calling and interactions on the basis that we are de facto available (to ourselves) and we "allocate" our effort in trying to communicate with others. Great Post. And Interesting to hear about the "availability of self" and "availability of others" from a presence perspective. Maybe that's because we unconsciously order our calling and interactions on the basis that we are de facto available (to ourselves) and we "allocate" our effort in trying to communicate with others.

]]>