<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T Unity: Big deal, or just big news?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/01/20/att-unity-big-deal-or-just-big-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/01/20/att-unity-big-deal-or-just-big-news/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=att-unity-big-deal-or-just-big-news</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: roderickm</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/01/20/att-unity-big-deal-or-just-big-news/#comment-4377</link>
		<dc:creator>roderickm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/01/20/att-unity-big-deal-or-just-big-news/#comment-4377</guid>
		<description>&quot;wireline minutes are down 40% since 2001&quot; 
 
The PSTN wasn&#039;t just used for voice. Many modem users have migrated to DSL or Cable internet services in the past five years. (Seen an AOL CD lately?) This may seem a minor factor, but modem calls are typically much longer than voice conversations. I can easily see how modem users migrating off the PSTN to DSL/Cable and competition from wireless providers have hit wireline minutes so hard. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;wireline minutes are down 40% since 2001&quot; </p>
<p>The PSTN wasn&#039;t just used for voice. Many modem users have migrated to DSL or Cable internet services in the past five years. (Seen an AOL CD lately?) This may seem a minor factor, but modem calls are typically much longer than voice conversations. I can easily see how modem users migrating off the PSTN to DSL/Cable and competition from wireless providers have hit wireline minutes so hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/01/20/att-unity-big-deal-or-just-big-news/#comment-4375</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/01/20/att-unity-big-deal-or-just-big-news/#comment-4375</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Alec.

Do you see any benefit to the consumer or is this strictly self-serving to AT&amp;T?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Alec.</p>
<p>Do you see any benefit to the consumer or is this strictly self-serving to AT&amp;T?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/01/20/att-unity-big-deal-or-just-big-news/#comment-4373</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 16:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/01/20/att-unity-big-deal-or-just-big-news/#comment-4373</guid>
		<description>I donâ€™t see the big disruption here. If you already must have an unlimited land line plan, what are you gaining? No penalty for cell phone minutes? With thousands of roll-over minutes anyway on Cingular, is this even an issue for most consumers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I donâ€™t see the big disruption here. If you already must have an unlimited land line plan, what are you gaining? No penalty for cell phone minutes? With thousands of roll-over minutes anyway on Cingular, is this even an issue for most consumers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/01/20/att-unity-big-deal-or-just-big-news/#comment-4376</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/01/20/att-unity-big-deal-or-just-big-news/#comment-4376</guid>
		<description>I think AT&amp;T customers will benefit, no doubt.  It&#039;s the AT&amp;T shareholder that is going to suffer, and that&#039;s because this action will likely not lead to any substantial number of new subscribers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think AT&amp;T customers will benefit, no doubt.  It&#039;s the AT&amp;T shareholder that is going to suffer, and that&#039;s because this action will likely not lead to any substantial number of new subscribers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2007/01/20/att-unity-big-deal-or-just-big-news/#comment-4374</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2007/01/20/att-unity-big-deal-or-just-big-news/#comment-4374</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a disruption at all, Jonathan.  It&#039;s a rear guard action to encourage existing AT&amp;T customers to stay. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a disruption at all, Jonathan.  It&#039;s a rear guard action to encourage existing AT&amp;T customers to stay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

