<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The W-Group:  PR Noobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=w-group-pr-noobs</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: color brochure printing</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4256</link>
		<dc:creator>color brochure printing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 16:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4256</guid>
		<description>Scam! Scam! Scam! It&#039;s a &quot;long con&quot;. Stay away I was burned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scam! Scam! Scam! It&#8217;s a &#8220;long con&#8221;. Stay away I was burned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Common Sense &#187; How NOT to get your product/solution noticed</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4255</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Common Sense &#187; How NOT to get your product/solution noticed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4255</guid>
		<description>[...] I recently shared in the pleasure Alec Saunders enjoyed receiving some unsolicited mail from a PR group about a service offering. He wrote a follow-up note here. Alec views is as spam, and I don&#8217;t disagree. On the other hand, in my role as an analyst, blogger, and generally outspoken pain in the ass, I take most of these unsolicited emails with a grain of salt. They quickly go to the bit bucket without comment. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I recently shared in the pleasure Alec Saunders enjoyed receiving some unsolicited mail from a PR group about a service offering. He wrote a follow-up note here. Alec views is as spam, and I don&#8217;t disagree. On the other hand, in my role as an analyst, blogger, and generally outspoken pain in the ass, I take most of these unsolicited emails with a grain of salt. They quickly go to the bit bucket without comment. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -- Alec Saunders .LOG</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4254</link>
		<dc:creator>-- Alec Saunders .LOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 03:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4254</guid>
		<description>[...] Got home tonight, had a lovely ham dinner, and settled down to the PC with a pint of beer in my hand.Â  I just about spit my beer out my nose at what I read next.Â  Remember that fellow Thomas Scriven? The W-Group spammer I wrote about yesterday, who sent me a pitch letter marked confidential?Â  Well, here&#8217;s what he wrote back next: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Got home tonight, had a lovely ham dinner, and settled down to the PC with a pint of beer in my hand.Â  I just about spit my beer out my nose at what I read next.Â  Remember that fellow Thomas Scriven? The W-Group spammer I wrote about yesterday, who sent me a pitch letter marked confidential?Â  Well, here&#8217;s what he wrote back next: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moshe Maeir</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4253</link>
		<dc:creator>Moshe Maeir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4253</guid>
		<description>Alec,
I call it a scam, you can call it a loophole if you prefer. The fact is that Congress mandated the Universal Service Fund as a way to bring  equal service to rural areas, not so some slick  operator can make a quick buck. Sure the people in Iowa also benefit, but that doesn&#039;t make it right, unless you believe in a Robin Hood regime.

The bottom line is that US taxpayer money is being used to subsidize international calls -  even though it is not in the US Government budget that was approved by Congress....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alec,<br />
I call it a scam, you can call it a loophole if you prefer. The fact is that Congress mandated the Universal Service Fund as a way to bring  equal service to rural areas, not so some slick  operator can make a quick buck. Sure the people in Iowa also benefit, but that doesn&#8217;t make it right, unless you believe in a Robin Hood regime.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that US taxpayer money is being used to subsidize international calls &#8211;  even though it is not in the US Government budget that was approved by Congress&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4252</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4252</guid>
		<description>Moshe -- I am not sure I agree it&#039;s a scam.  I&#039;ve spoken with a few folks in the know, and certainly these models have been very good for the iowa communications industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moshe &#8212; I am not sure I agree it&#8217;s a scam.  I&#8217;ve spoken with a few folks in the know, and certainly these models have been very good for the iowa communications industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4251</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4251</guid>
		<description>Eric -- alecs is my email ID.  It wasn&#039;t a mispelling.  It was a mail merge with a list he bought some where.  This guy spammed me. That&#039;s what happened to the luuuuuuv :)

Loopy -- I find the 712 area code models fascinating. Any PR might be good PR, but he could have had BETTER by not irritating me.  C&#039;est la vie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric &#8212; alecs is my email ID.  It wasn&#8217;t a mispelling.  It was a mail merge with a list he bought some where.  This guy spammed me. That&#8217;s what happened to the luuuuuuv <img src='http://www.saunderslog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Loopy &#8212; I find the 712 area code models fascinating. Any PR might be good PR, but he could have had BETTER by not irritating me.  C&#8217;est la vie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4248</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 03:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4248</guid>
		<description>I tried their number -- 712-338-8849.  It actually worked quite well, and the call was a lot clearer than using Futurephone.  I also got through on the first try, and on every try, unlike Futurephone and all too familiar message of &quot;Please try again later.&quot;

Also, Alec -- blogging has made you one SOUR GUY! haha..he just mispelled your name with an S, obv by accident!

What happened to the luuuuuuuuv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried their number &#8212; 712-338-8849.  It actually worked quite well, and the call was a lot clearer than using Futurephone.  I also got through on the first try, and on every try, unlike Futurephone and all too familiar message of &#8220;Please try again later.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also, Alec &#8212; blogging has made you one SOUR GUY! haha..he just mispelled your name with an S, obv by accident!</p>
<p>What happened to the luuuuuuuuv</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moshe Maeir</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4250</link>
		<dc:creator>Moshe Maeir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 03:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4250</guid>
		<description>Alec, 
As the old saying goes - it doesn&#039;t matter what you write about me as long as you spell my name right... 
 
I know for a fact that Futurephone and others are quite successful in emigrant communities such as NY. However 
they have limited scalability  and therefore are not a major threat to the Big Guys. I wonder when Congress will catch on to this scam. Sure it is legal, but in my mind it is still a scam. 
 
If it is  true that Efax also routes thru Iowa - they ain&#039;t doing bad as they  charge $16.95 for a DID and get away with it! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alec,<br />
As the old saying goes &#8211; it doesn&#039;t matter what you write about me as long as you spell my name right&#8230; </p>
<p>I know for a fact that Futurephone and others are quite successful in emigrant communities such as NY. However<br />
they have limited scalability  and therefore are not a major threat to the Big Guys. I wonder when Congress will catch on to this scam. Sure it is legal, but in my mind it is still a scam. </p>
<p>If it is  true that Efax also routes thru Iowa &#8211; they ain&#039;t doing bad as they  charge $16.95 for a DID and get away with it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loopy</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4249</link>
		<dc:creator>Loopy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 02:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4249</guid>
		<description>Alec, 
 
I take my hat off to the guys. They have cornered an influential name in the industry, they have been creative [probably been using Seth Godin tactics] and they have gotten a piece written about them [regardless of the value of the product/service]. 
 
Sweet :0) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alec, </p>
<p>I take my hat off to the guys. They have cornered an influential name in the industry, they have been creative [probably been using Seth Godin tactics] and they have gotten a piece written about them [regardless of the value of the product/service]. </p>
<p>Sweet :0)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Camp</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4247</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Camp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 21:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/12/27/w-group-pr-noobs/#comment-4247</guid>
		<description>I got the same email pitch. Looked it over and tagged it as spam crap and tossed them into the filter. I debated posting something, but didn&#039;t figure they deserved any attention at all with that shabby approach. Actually, I was just keeping their confidence... 
 
;-) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the same email pitch. Looked it over and tagged it as spam crap and tossed them into the filter. I debated posting something, but didn&#039;t figure they deserved any attention at all with that shabby approach. Actually, I was just keeping their confidence&#8230;<br />
  <img src='http://www.saunderslog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

