Comments on: Seguineau: The Three Legs of Presence http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/10/24/seguineau-the-three-legs-of-presence/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=seguineau-the-three-legs-of-presence An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog. Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Alec http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/10/24/seguineau-the-three-legs-of-presence/#comment-3811 Alec Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:56:40 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/24/seguineau-the-three-legs-of-presence/#comment-3811 Thanks for the clarification Jean-Louis. My view was that as you were synthesizing other works, it was proper to attribute the post to you, but I agree it could have been a little more clearly expressed. Great post, by the way. Thanks for the clarification Jean-Louis. My view was that as you were synthesizing other works, it was proper to attribute the post to you, but I agree it could have been a little more clearly expressed.

Great post, by the way.

]]> By: Jean-Louis Seguineau http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/10/24/seguineau-the-three-legs-of-presence/#comment-3810 Jean-Louis Seguineau Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:19:00 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/24/seguineau-the-three-legs-of-presence/#comment-3810 Alec, I believe you misred the post when saying that "I" gave a definition of presence as the two excerpts you cite ;) In fact the first definition comes from Short et al. (1976) "The Social Psychology of Telecommunications", and the second from Biocca et al. (2001) "Criteria and Scope conditions for a Theory and Measure of Social Presence". I will add these references to the post to avoid any further confusion. These papers are studying the psychological side effects of computer mediated communications and Short came up with the name "social presence" which is kind of misleading when compared to today's common notion of presence... My point being that "social presence" is only one of its components. Alec,

I believe you misred the post when saying that "I" gave a definition of presence as the two excerpts you cite ;)

In fact the first definition comes from Short et al. (1976) "The Social Psychology of Telecommunications", and the second from Biocca et al. (2001) "Criteria and Scope conditions for a Theory
and Measure of Social Presence". I will add these references to the post to avoid any further confusion.

These papers are studying the psychological side effects of computer mediated communications and Short came up with the name "social presence" which is kind of misleading when compared to today's common notion of presence… My point being that "social presence" is only one of its components.

]]>