Comments on: Spoof Me, Please! http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/10/02/spoof-me-please/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=spoof-me-please An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog. Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: spadez http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/10/02/spoof-me-please/#comment-3551 spadez Wed, 04 Apr 2007 02:49:35 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/02/spoof-me-please/#comment-3551 yo uze are nuts all u gotta do is dial a # then they ask who u wanna call and where u wanna cal from thats it yo uze are nuts all u gotta do is dial a # then they ask who u wanna call and where u wanna cal from thats it

]]> By: Signal to Noise » Caller ID 2.0 http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/10/02/spoof-me-please/#comment-3550 Signal to Noise » Caller ID 2.0 Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:58:07 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/02/spoof-me-please/#comment-3550 [...] Alec has a nice brief post about the shortcomings of Caller ID and what voice 2.0 peeps are doing about it. [...] [...] Alec has a nice brief post about the shortcomings of Caller ID and what voice 2.0 peeps are doing about it. [...]

]]> By: Aswath http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/10/02/spoof-me-please/#comment-3549 Aswath Mon, 02 Oct 2006 13:59:38 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2006/10/02/spoof-me-please/#comment-3549 You are right that caller's identity and the line ID (commonly, but erroneously called Caller ID) are not fungible. Indeed the relevant protocols allow for carrying the former and a way to identify whether the service provider has verified this information or not. The first problem is that the incumbents (or is it device vendors?) do not deliver that information to the users. The second problem is that with the current technology, it is not easy to deliver the custome information to the service provider, in the first place. Hence we have to depend on external means like a web page. But then you knew all that. :-) You are right that caller's identity and the line ID (commonly, but erroneously called Caller ID) are not fungible. Indeed the relevant protocols allow for carrying the former and a way to identify whether the service provider has verified this information or not. The first problem is that the incumbents (or is it device vendors?) do not deliver that information to the users. The second problem is that with the current technology, it is not easy to deliver the custome information to the service provider, in the first place. Hence we have to depend on external means like a web page.

But then you knew all that. :-)

]]>