<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rodriguez: Tilting at Windmills</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/09/13/rodriguez-tilting-at-windmills/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/09/13/rodriguez-tilting-at-windmills/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rodriguez-tilting-at-windmills</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Jardine</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/09/13/rodriguez-tilting-at-windmills/#comment-3394</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Jardine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/09/13/rodriguez-tilting-at-windmills/#comment-3394</guid>
		<description>For some reason I actually read through to the end of his article. 
He has a point, though no more eloquently put than those he is criticising. 
A large amount of the &#039;content&#039; in the blogosphere is mere echo, with limited added value in terms of content augmentation. The value is in stimulating discussion and creating &#039;buzz&#039; on a topic. 
Someone has to provide some analysis/review/opinion, but it needn&#039;t be everyone. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason I actually read through to the end of his article.<br />
He has a point, though no more eloquently put than those he is criticising.<br />
A large amount of the &#039;content&#039; in the blogosphere is mere echo, with limited added value in terms of content augmentation. The value is in stimulating discussion and creating &#039;buzz&#039; on a topic.<br />
Someone has to provide some analysis/review/opinion, but it needn&#039;t be everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

