<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coghead: A New Web Development Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/07/08/2602/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/07/08/2602/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=2602</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles B</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/07/08/2602/#comment-3130</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 01:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/07/08/2602/#comment-3130</guid>
		<description>Your point about the true number of &quot;hardcore&quot; programmers versus &quot;line of business&quot; ones is absolutely correct, and something I think most people fail to grasp.  Thanks for providing some true insight with your post!!! 
 
I think you&#039;ll be (pleasantly) surprised by what is possible using Coghead without resorting to code.  I&#039;ve been using the beta for several months and it is VERY cool - as an old Access &quot;developer&quot;, I can say that I&#039;m converted.  I&#039;ve also played with Interneer, and will only tell the prior respondant that Coghead is a totally different animal.  Interneer has significant limitations (yes, very flexible for what it is, but that&#039;s not saying a whole lot). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your point about the true number of &quot;hardcore&quot; programmers versus &quot;line of business&quot; ones is absolutely correct, and something I think most people fail to grasp.  Thanks for providing some true insight with your post!!! </p>
<p>I think you&#039;ll be (pleasantly) surprised by what is possible using Coghead without resorting to code.  I&#039;ve been using the beta for several months and it is VERY cool &#8211; as an old Access &quot;developer&quot;, I can say that I&#039;m converted.  I&#039;ve also played with Interneer, and will only tell the prior respondant that Coghead is a totally different animal.  Interneer has significant limitations (yes, very flexible for what it is, but that&#039;s not saying a whole lot).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Steffen</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/07/08/2602/#comment-3129</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Steffen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 21:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/07/08/2602/#comment-3129</guid>
		<description>I was wondering if you have ever heard of Interneer Intellect?  It is a web-based project and process management system that is extremely flexible.  It is designed to be configured by the basic business user who has no knowledge of programming.  It is similar to CogHead.  I would just say that it currently is developed to the point that Coghead could hope to be in 2-3 years.  Interneer was the first company to really get involved in web-based user-configured business management software.  That&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s why Interneer is so far ahead of all the newbies just now getting into the game&#226;&#8364;&#166; like Coghead. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if you have ever heard of Interneer Intellect?  It is a web-based project and process management system that is extremely flexible.  It is designed to be configured by the basic business user who has no knowledge of programming.  It is similar to CogHead.  I would just say that it currently is developed to the point that Coghead could hope to be in 2-3 years.  Interneer was the first company to really get involved in web-based user-configured business management software.  That&acirc;&euro;&trade;s why Interneer is so far ahead of all the newbies just now getting into the game&acirc;&euro;&brvbar; like Coghead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

