<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Net2Phone: Owner of the VoIP A-Bomb?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/06/06/net2phone-owner-of-the-voip-a-bomb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/06/06/net2phone-owner-of-the-voip-a-bomb/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=net2phone-owner-of-the-voip-a-bomb</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: skibare</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/06/06/net2phone-owner-of-the-voip-a-bomb/#comment-2389</link>
		<dc:creator>skibare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/06/net2phone-owner-of-the-voip-a-bomb/#comment-2389</guid>
		<description>hey, I am the VOIP NUKE........you must have stolen my PATENT on the Voip &quot;A&quot; Bomb........ 
skibare </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, I am the VOIP NUKE&#8230;&#8230;..you must have stolen my PATENT on the Voip &quot;A&quot; Bomb&#8230;&#8230;..<br />
skibare</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: /pd</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/06/06/net2phone-owner-of-the-voip-a-bomb/#comment-2388</link>
		<dc:creator>/pd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/06/net2phone-owner-of-the-voip-a-bomb/#comment-2388</guid>
		<description>its funny that net2phone is suddenly emerging out of the burrows. Way back ion 1997/9 I played with net2phine and it was darn good. But for some reasons they did not gain traction ! !! 
 
Or was this part of the Strategy itself ?? lie low, let a contender come in. let thme put in the hardworks and then and make the big Bucks and then sue them . 
 
this is same history akin to the  NTP and RIM case !! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its funny that net2phone is suddenly emerging out of the burrows. Way back ion 1997/9 I played with net2phine and it was darn good. But for some reasons they did not gain traction ! !! </p>
<p>Or was this part of the Strategy itself ?? lie low, let a contender come in. let thme put in the hardworks and then and make the big Bucks and then sue them . </p>
<p>this is same history akin to the  NTP and RIM case !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmanuel Proulx</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/06/06/net2phone-owner-of-the-voip-a-bomb/#comment-2387</link>
		<dc:creator>Emmanuel Proulx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/06/net2phone-owner-of-the-voip-a-bomb/#comment-2387</guid>
		<description>Yet another example of patent that&#039;s just too general. I myself am thinking about patenting &quot;talking&quot;. 
 
This brings up the question of proprietary versus standard technology. Not that this kind of issue wouldn&#039;t come up if you stick with standards. But I&#039;m sure it would be much harder to sue the industry in general rather than a single company. I&#039;d like to see Net2Phone sue companies over SIP. That would go nowhere. 
 
I guess telling Skype &quot;I told you so, you should have used SIP&quot; won&#039;t help at this point. 
 
Emmanuel </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another example of patent that&#039;s just too general. I myself am thinking about patenting &quot;talking&quot;. </p>
<p>This brings up the question of proprietary versus standard technology. Not that this kind of issue wouldn&#039;t come up if you stick with standards. But I&#039;m sure it would be much harder to sue the industry in general rather than a single company. I&#039;d like to see Net2Phone sue companies over SIP. That would go nowhere. </p>
<p>I guess telling Skype &quot;I told you so, you should have used SIP&quot; won&#039;t help at this point. </p>
<p>Emmanuel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

