<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GotVoice: the SMTP of Voice Mail.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/gotvoice-the-smtp-of-voice-mail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/gotvoice-the-smtp-of-voice-mail/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=gotvoice-the-smtp-of-voice-mail</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Ford</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/gotvoice-the-smtp-of-voice-mail/#comment-2381</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 16:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/gotvoice-the-smtp-of-voice-mail/#comment-2381</guid>
		<description>Alec, 
 
Thanks for the discussion and you bring up good points.  IMHO the issue on UM&#039;s is state.  Scott Bradner would tell me I should be able to use a cookie to when voice mail is left behind.  I dont have to poll and in theory the presentity of my voice mail box could be marked available, once. 
 
More on Jeff&#039;s Blog. 
 
Kind Regards, 
 
carl </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alec, </p>
<p>Thanks for the discussion and you bring up good points.  IMHO the issue on UM&#039;s is state.  Scott Bradner would tell me I should be able to use a cookie to when voice mail is left behind.  I dont have to poll and in theory the presentity of my voice mail box could be marked available, once. </p>
<p>More on Jeff&#039;s Blog. </p>
<p>Kind Regards, </p>
<p>carl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/gotvoice-the-smtp-of-voice-mail/#comment-2380</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 08:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/gotvoice-the-smtp-of-voice-mail/#comment-2380</guid>
		<description>Even if they&#039;re not paying for wireless minutes (which I agree, is unlikely), they&#039;re still going to be paying for PSTN charges.  For a free service, even small PSTN charges are an expense. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if they&#039;re not paying for wireless minutes (which I agree, is unlikely), they&#039;re still going to be paying for PSTN charges.  For a free service, even small PSTN charges are an expense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/gotvoice-the-smtp-of-voice-mail/#comment-2379</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 08:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/gotvoice-the-smtp-of-voice-mail/#comment-2379</guid>
		<description>&quot;which is workable but will incur network charges to poll and retrieve the voice mails.&quot; 
 
Do you mean wireless network charges?  As far as I can see, they can poll my (generally Octel, or some Lucent derivative) box via PSTN provided I give them my PIN, so they shouldn&#039;t incur network charges (negligable if any) 
 
Your point isn&#039;t lost, I agree with you. If carriers operated on platforms VXML/SIP etc., and didn&#039;t rely on proprietary messaging gear, they would be open to third party solutions for a variety of vendors ie: LD deregulation, it woudl actually increase revenue in the long term and create partners rather than competitors. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;which is workable but will incur network charges to poll and retrieve the voice mails.&quot; </p>
<p>Do you mean wireless network charges?  As far as I can see, they can poll my (generally Octel, or some Lucent derivative) box via PSTN provided I give them my PIN, so they shouldn&#039;t incur network charges (negligable if any) </p>
<p>Your point isn&#039;t lost, I agree with you. If carriers operated on platforms VXML/SIP etc., and didn&#039;t rely on proprietary messaging gear, they would be open to third party solutions for a variety of vendors ie: LD deregulation, it woudl actually increase revenue in the long term and create partners rather than competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

