Comments on: Ford on Feature Interaction http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/2511/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=2511 An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog. Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Carl Ford http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/2511/#comment-2378 Carl Ford Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:16:57 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/2511/#comment-2378 I think that we are in violent agreement. What that means to me though is that the network is going to continue to fracture. In effect the Internet has come back to its roots. An Inter network of Virtual Networks. Some how this does not feel like the mission of the standard. I think that we are in violent agreement. What that means to me though is that the network is going to continue to fracture. In effect the Internet has come back to its roots. An Inter network of Virtual Networks.

Some how this does not feel like the mission of the standard.

]]> By: Alec http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/2511/#comment-2377 Alec Tue, 06 Jun 2006 06:15:49 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/2511/#comment-2377 No doubt, Carl. I think feature interactions can be designed for. I guess what I am questioning is whether it makes business sense for the network operator to design for them. No doubt, Carl. I think feature interactions can be designed for. I guess what I am questioning is whether it makes business sense for the network operator to design for them.

]]> By: Carl Ford http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/2511/#comment-2376 Carl Ford Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:13:34 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2006/06/05/2511/#comment-2376 I still think its one of interaction. The model you brought up of VONAGE is a good one, since they are not in control of the wireless network (yet ; I still think its one of interaction. The model you brought up of VONAGE is a good one, since they are not in control of the wireless network (yet ;

]]>