<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/05/23/skype-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/05/23/skype-advertising/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=skype-advertising</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/05/23/skype-advertising/#comment-2304</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 06:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/23/skype-advertising/#comment-2304</guid>
		<description>Dennis, I don&#039;t think there is a way to advertise in Skype.  Not that I&#039;ve heard of.  These ads are being done by Skype in Google searches. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, I don&#039;t think there is a way to advertise in Skype.  Not that I&#039;ve heard of.  These ads are being done by Skype in Google searches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/05/23/skype-advertising/#comment-2303</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 04:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/23/skype-advertising/#comment-2303</guid>
		<description>Excuse me ALEC... could you please tell me how to do the advertisement in SKYPE. I read this just now, kinda interested! I just dont know how to do it. Or otherwise if you could provide me the information regarding this. 
 
thanks. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me ALEC&#8230; could you please tell me how to do the advertisement in SKYPE. I read this just now, kinda interested! I just dont know how to do it. Or otherwise if you could provide me the information regarding this. </p>
<p>thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haidrin</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/05/23/skype-advertising/#comment-2302</link>
		<dc:creator>Haidrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/23/skype-advertising/#comment-2302</guid>
		<description>Hey Alec, you know if there&#039;s a way for us to advertise on SKYPE?  I&#039;ve herad that we can actually do that. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Alec, you know if there&#039;s a way for us to advertise on SKYPE?  I&#039;ve herad that we can actually do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Charles Morin</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/05/23/skype-advertising/#comment-2300</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Charles Morin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 18:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/23/skype-advertising/#comment-2300</guid>
		<description>It never hurts to try new things. This might be just a Skype marketing experiment, which would obvious float to the top of VOIP blogs, like this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It never hurts to try new things. This might be just a Skype marketing experiment, which would obvious float to the top of VOIP blogs, like this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/05/23/skype-advertising/#comment-2301</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 15:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/23/skype-advertising/#comment-2301</guid>
		<description>Yes, and that&#039;s one of the beauties of Adsense.  There are few advertising media as testable. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, and that&#039;s one of the beauties of Adsense.  There are few advertising media as testable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/05/23/skype-advertising/#comment-2299</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 14:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/23/skype-advertising/#comment-2299</guid>
		<description>Very true, Aswath! VERY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true, Aswath! VERY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aswath</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/05/23/skype-advertising/#comment-2298</link>
		<dc:creator>Aswath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 14:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/23/skype-advertising/#comment-2298</guid>
		<description>Given this and free, unlimited national calling for American and Canadian subscribers, it looks like the cost of acquisition is not zero anymore. Probably we have to revisit some of the recent analysis comparing Skype&#039;s business in relation to Vonage&#039;s. Worse, it sure looks like the revolutionary is after all a reactionary in the sense POTS is still the pull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given this and free, unlimited national calling for American and Canadian subscribers, it looks like the cost of acquisition is not zero anymore. Probably we have to revisit some of the recent analysis comparing Skype&#8217;s business in relation to Vonage&#8217;s. Worse, it sure looks like the revolutionary is after all a reactionary in the sense POTS is still the pull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

