<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Activating Akismet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/05/19/activating-akismet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/05/19/activating-akismet/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=activating-akismet</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip&#8217;s Quips &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A quiz met</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/05/19/activating-akismet/#comment-2208</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip&#8217;s Quips &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A quiz met</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 21:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/19/activating-akismet/#comment-2208</guid>
		<description>[...] It sounds like Alec Saunders is experiencing the same Akismet ecstasy that I am. Chris Pirillo, though, not quite as excited. Chris reports massive false positives. What could be up with that? I haven&#8217;t had one false positive in hundreds of spomments caught. There aren&#8217;t any configuration parameters, so it would be hard for it to be something Chris did in setting it up. I don&#8217;t know how Akismet works, but perhaps there is some text being analyzed from Chris&#8217; site that is always considered spammish? Or maybe it was a momentary failure of the Akismet service? Any other ideas? [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It sounds like Alec Saunders is experiencing the same Akismet ecstasy that I am. Chris Pirillo, though, not quite as excited. Chris reports massive false positives. What could be up with that? I haven&#8217;t had one false positive in hundreds of spomments caught. There aren&#8217;t any configuration parameters, so it would be hard for it to be something Chris did in setting it up. I don&#8217;t know how Akismet works, but perhaps there is some text being analyzed from Chris&#8217; site that is always considered spammish? Or maybe it was a momentary failure of the Akismet service? Any other ideas? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/05/19/activating-akismet/#comment-2207</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 10:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/19/activating-akismet/#comment-2207</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never tried Spam Karma, Ken.  But so far, Akismet looks good. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve never tried Spam Karma, Ken.  But so far, Akismet looks good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Camp</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/05/19/activating-akismet/#comment-2206</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Camp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 09:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/05/19/activating-akismet/#comment-2206</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never used Askimet myself. I&#039;ve used Spam Karma 2.0 for a long time now. Hope Askimet solves that problem. Comment spam is such a pain to deal with. If they find another way around, Spam Karma seems to let about 1 in 500 through, but does a real good job. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve never used Askimet myself. I&#039;ve used Spam Karma 2.0 for a long time now. Hope Askimet solves that problem. Comment spam is such a pain to deal with. If they find another way around, Spam Karma seems to let about 1 in 500 through, but does a real good job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

