<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rewrite 60% of Windows? Hogwash!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrwe LAdanowski</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1308</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrwe LAdanowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 04:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1308</guid>
		<description>My name is Andrew Ladanowski I used to work for Tina Romeo-Salem when I was at Crosskeys.  I worked for her for about 6 months to replace a lady who was on maternity leave.  Could you please forward this email to her and ask her to email or call me ASAP.  I need her for a reference/acknowledgement of employment. 
 
This is urgent 
 
Cheers Andrew Ladanowski 
 
(954) 815-2402 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My name is Andrew Ladanowski I used to work for Tina Romeo-Salem when I was at Crosskeys.  I worked for her for about 6 months to replace a lady who was on maternity leave.  Could you please forward this email to her and ask her to email or call me ASAP.  I need her for a reference/acknowledgement of employment. </p>
<p>This is urgent </p>
<p>Cheers Andrew Ladanowski </p>
<p>(954) 815-2402</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Installing Windows Vista -- Alec Saunders .LOG</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1307</link>
		<dc:creator>Installing Windows Vista -- Alec Saunders .LOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1307</guid>
		<description>[...] After the hogwash posting, I received a number of comments on this piece of it: I&#8217;ve lived through lots of Windows launches inside Microsoft&#160;(3.1, NT 3.1, NT 3.5, Windows 95, NT 4.0, Windows 98, Windows 98 SE, Windows ME, Windows 2000) and outside (Windows XP beta tester).&#160; I love early software.&#160;I&#8217;ll put up with&#160;just about any&#160;egregious bloated crap&#160;just to see what the fuss is all about. &#160;But you know,&#160;at this point I&#8217;ve been unable to succesfully install and use any version of the Windows Vista CTPs, or IE 7.&#160; If Vista was really six months away from shipping,&#160;it would&#160;be a lot more finished, the way that&#160;any of those previous versions of Windows were at this stage.&#160; Anybody who had tried&#160;Vista would have been able to come to the same conclusion I did. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After the hogwash posting, I received a number of comments on this piece of it: I&rsquo;ve lived through lots of Windows launches inside Microsoft&nbsp;(3.1, NT 3.1, NT 3.5, Windows 95, NT 4.0, Windows 98, Windows 98 SE, Windows ME, Windows 2000) and outside (Windows XP beta tester).&nbsp; I love early software.&nbsp;I&rsquo;ll put up with&nbsp;just about any&nbsp;egregious bloated crap&nbsp;just to see what the fuss is all about. &nbsp;But you know,&nbsp;at this point I&rsquo;ve been unable to succesfully install and use any version of the Windows Vista CTPs, or IE 7.&nbsp; If Vista was really six months away from shipping,&nbsp;it would&nbsp;be a lot more finished, the way that&nbsp;any of those previous versions of Windows were at this stage.&nbsp; Anybody who had tried&nbsp;Vista would have been able to come to the same conclusion I did. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1306</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 03:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1306</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;90% of Microsoft Rumors are Untrue (re: 60% Vista Rewrite)&lt;/strong&gt;

The rumor started with the authoritative headline &#8220;60% of Windows Vista Code To Be Rewritten&#8220;. Although the article doesn&#8217;t offer any detailson how the 60% estimate was reached, The Internet took the story and ran with it.
The argumen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>90% of Microsoft Rumors are Untrue (re: 60% Vista Rewrite)</strong></p>
<p>The rumor started with the authoritative headline &#8220;60% of Windows Vista Code To Be Rewritten&#8220;. Although the article doesn&#8217;t offer any detailson how the 60% estimate was reached, The Internet took the story and ran with it.<br />
The argumen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixelglove &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rewrite 60% of Windows? Hogwash!</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1305</link>
		<dc:creator>pixelglove &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rewrite 60% of Windows? Hogwash!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1305</guid>
		<description>[...] Then againâ€¦ Rewrite 60% of Windows? Hogwash! [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Then againâ€¦ Rewrite 60% of Windows? Hogwash! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1304</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1304</guid>
		<description>Rog42 and Chris, 
 
I installed IE 7 the other day.  You can read about my experience here: 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://saunderslog.com/2006/03/20/ie7-beta-2-preview-not-ready-for-prime-time/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://saunderslog.com/2006/03/20/ie7-beta-2-prev...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
The few times I&#039;ve tried to install Vista, I&#039;ve had basics -- like the installer failing -- stand in the way.  Anyway, yesterday I scrubbed one of the PC&#039;s around here, made a bootable CTP DVD from MSDN, and started it again.  Seems I have a running Vista machine at the moment.  I&#039;ve already seen things like the &quot;browse for drivers&quot; window in the driver update system fail (generated a report back to MSFT).  It&#039;s better than previous experiences, but I haven&#039;t used it enough to know how good it is. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rog42 and Chris, </p>
<p>I installed IE 7 the other day.  You can read about my experience here:<br />
  <a href="http://saunderslog.com/2006/03/20/ie7-beta-2-preview-not-ready-for-prime-time/" rel="nofollow">http://saunderslog.com/2006/03/20/ie7-beta-2-prev&#8230;</a> </p>
<p>The few times I&#039;ve tried to install Vista, I&#039;ve had basics &#8212; like the installer failing &#8212; stand in the way.  Anyway, yesterday I scrubbed one of the PC&#039;s around here, made a bootable CTP DVD from MSDN, and started it again.  Seems I have a running Vista machine at the moment.  I&#039;ve already seen things like the &quot;browse for drivers&quot; window in the driver update system fail (generated a report back to MSFT).  It&#039;s better than previous experiences, but I haven&#039;t used it enough to know how good it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1303</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1303</guid>
		<description>Humm... all this stuff about Vista not being ready/usable for/by ordinary people or developers seems odd. I say this because many of those who test/develop software are so wrapped up in their projects they often have littel time for the News. Oh sure maybe catching a cable show or two, but there are many stories not covered. 
 
One of those for which I no longer have a link) appeared maybe a month ago - seems that in Iran, where none of our copywrite/use laws have any effect, and where they have none of their own - Vista is in widespread use i.e. everyone uses it. The story focused on the rise of ISPs in every storefront/home. 
 
While this is evidently some beta, no one there seems to care. and while there must be many parts that are incomplete or buggy -  It works, they use it. So since this seems to be the case - at least in Iran - why does anypart have to be rewritten, let alon 60% ? 
 
Food for thought </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humm&#8230; all this stuff about Vista not being ready/usable for/by ordinary people or developers seems odd. I say this because many of those who test/develop software are so wrapped up in their projects they often have littel time for the News. Oh sure maybe catching a cable show or two, but there are many stories not covered. </p>
<p>One of those for which I no longer have a link) appeared maybe a month ago &#8211; seems that in Iran, where none of our copywrite/use laws have any effect, and where they have none of their own &#8211; Vista is in widespread use i.e. everyone uses it. The story focused on the rise of ISPs in every storefront/home. </p>
<p>While this is evidently some beta, no one there seems to care. and while there must be many parts that are incomplete or buggy &#8211;  It works, they use it. So since this seems to be the case &#8211; at least in Iran &#8211; why does anypart have to be rewritten, let alon 60% ? </p>
<p>Food for thought</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It Must Suck To Be Ray -- Alec Saunders .LOG</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1302</link>
		<dc:creator>It Must Suck To Be Ray -- Alec Saunders .LOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1302</guid>
		<description>[...] Alec Saunders .LOG  Alec Saunders&#8217; personal soapbox on World Events, Canadian Politics, and the Technology Business. Ingredients include a little wine, and a lot of VoIP.         &#171; Rewrite 60% of Windows? Hogwash! [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alec Saunders .LOG  Alec Saunders&#8217; personal soapbox on World Events, Canadian Politics, and the Technology Business. Ingredients include a little wine, and a lot of VoIP.         &laquo; Rewrite 60% of Windows? Hogwash! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1301</link>
		<dc:creator>James Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1301</guid>
		<description>No one at Microsoft has read &quot;Mythical Man Month&quot;? They are putting more engineers on a late software project. That is going to make it later. Vista is in seriously bad trouble as any experienced software engineer will attest. This is going to be ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one at Microsoft has read &#8220;Mythical Man Month&#8221;? They are putting more engineers on a late software project. That is going to make it later. Vista is in seriously bad trouble as any experienced software engineer will attest. This is going to be ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squash &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who the heck is David Richards?</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1299</link>
		<dc:creator>Squash &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who the heck is David Richards?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1299</guid>
		<description>[...] Dave Winer gives Richards &#8220;zero credence&#8221; and Alec Saunders also weighed in on the &#8220;hogwash&#8221; call. But then Richards has also had people back him including Stowe Boyd and Steve Gillmor who wrote to Scoble: Stop calling for the head of a reporter or an editor or both about the 60% code story. Are you so sure that&#8217;s untrue? Or put it another wayâ€“are you so sure anyone except maybe Bill really knows how much code has to be rewritten, or thrown away, to meet a January deadline which most likely will also slip? [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dave Winer gives Richards &#8220;zero credence&#8221; and Alec Saunders also weighed in on the &#8220;hogwash&#8221; call. But then Richards has also had people back him including Stowe Boyd and Steve Gillmor who wrote to Scoble: Stop calling for the head of a reporter or an editor or both about the 60% code story. Are you so sure that&#8217;s untrue? Or put it another wayâ€“are you so sure anyone except maybe Bill really knows how much code has to be rewritten, or thrown away, to meet a January deadline which most likely will also slip? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Dock</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1300</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Dock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/03/24/rewrite-60-of-windows-hogwash/#comment-1300</guid>
		<description>Copland </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Copland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

