<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sightspeed 4.5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/02/13/sightspeed-45/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/02/13/sightspeed-45/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sightspeed-45</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/02/13/sightspeed-45/#comment-1031</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/02/13/sightspeed-45/#comment-1031</guid>
		<description>Today, I signed up for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stickam.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.stickam.com&lt;/a&gt; , it integrated very easily into my blogger blog.  It provides realtime video AND a clientless flash VoIP service, chat, other videos, pictures etc.,  essentially this is video, but the packaging is very compelling,  and I was quick to see potential business opportunities for it. 
 
Maybe video is compelling, as long as it is packaged and presented the right way. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, I signed up for <a href="http://www.stickam.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.stickam.com</a> , it integrated very easily into my blogger blog.  It provides realtime video AND a clientless flash VoIP service, chat, other videos, pictures etc.,  essentially this is video, but the packaging is very compelling,  and I was quick to see potential business opportunities for it. </p>
<p>Maybe video is compelling, as long as it is packaged and presented the right way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/02/13/sightspeed-45/#comment-1030</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/02/13/sightspeed-45/#comment-1030</guid>
		<description>I think these are all valid questions Andrew. Me personally, I am in your camp. Folks like Erik Lagerway, however, have this strong conviction that citizen journalism, for instance, is an untapped market.  I think the jury&#039;s still out. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think these are all valid questions Andrew. Me personally, I am in your camp. Folks like Erik Lagerway, however, have this strong conviction that citizen journalism, for instance, is an untapped market.  I think the jury&#039;s still out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2006/02/13/sightspeed-45/#comment-1029</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2006/02/13/sightspeed-45/#comment-1029</guid>
		<description>I like Sightspeed, it works great.   But someone has to ask the question though~ Does anyone really want video? 
 
Skype&#039;s video is cool, as is MSN, Yahoo&#039;s etc., what are the business reasons for Video, (get your mind out of the gutter Alec :) ) 
 
Maybe it is just me, but I don&#039;t particularily like it, voice is quicker - I can multitask without appearing rude on camera, and I don&#039;t have to be stationary. 
 
Do IMlike providers add it just because it is as relatively easy as voice?  and younger users constantly ask for it?  Personally, I think stereo conferencing is more compelling, but no one seems to be working on integrating that technology... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Sightspeed, it works great.   But someone has to ask the question though~ Does anyone really want video? </p>
<p>Skype&#039;s video is cool, as is MSN, Yahoo&#039;s etc., what are the business reasons for Video, (get your mind out of the gutter Alec <img src='http://www.saunderslog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) </p>
<p>Maybe it is just me, but I don&#039;t particularily like it, voice is quicker &#8211; I can multitask without appearing rude on camera, and I don&#039;t have to be stationary. </p>
<p>Do IMlike providers add it just because it is as relatively easy as voice?  and younger users constantly ask for it?  Personally, I think stereo conferencing is more compelling, but no one seems to be working on integrating that technology&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

