<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rogers Says &quot;We&#039;re not blocking Podcasts&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/11/27/rogers-says-were-not-blocking-podcasts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/11/27/rogers-says-were-not-blocking-podcasts/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rogers-says-were-not-blocking-podcasts</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prioritizing Podcasts Low: How? -- Alec Saunders .LOG</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/11/27/rogers-says-were-not-blocking-podcasts/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Prioritizing Podcasts Low: How? -- Alec Saunders .LOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/11/27/rogers-says-were-not-blocking-podcasts/#comment-601</guid>
		<description>[...] Regarding how Rogers might prioritize podcast traffic lower than email or web, a reader wrote to me this afternoon with this: I work for a small service provider and talked to the four largest traffic monitoring solutions: Sandvine, Packeteer, Cachelogic, and Allot Communications.&#160; I can&#8217;t recall who said it (I think it&#8217;s either Sandvine or Cachelogic), but one of them said that N.A. cable operators are controlling their peak traffic (and costs) by selective rejecting certain P2P requests at certain times.&#160; So rather than blocking it out outright, they are automating the selective rejection at certain times.&#160; Which is different again than apply rate policies. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Regarding how Rogers might prioritize podcast traffic lower than email or web, a reader wrote to me this afternoon with this: I work for a small service provider and talked to the four largest traffic monitoring solutions: Sandvine, Packeteer, Cachelogic, and Allot Communications.&nbsp; I can&#8217;t recall who said it (I think it&#8217;s either Sandvine or Cachelogic), but one of them said that N.A. cable operators are controlling their peak traffic (and costs) by selective rejecting certain P2P requests at certain times.&nbsp; So rather than blocking it out outright, they are automating the selective rejection at certain times.&nbsp; Which is different again than apply rate policies. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris Mann</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/11/27/rogers-says-were-not-blocking-podcasts/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 20:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/11/27/rogers-says-were-not-blocking-podcasts/#comment-602</guid>
		<description>I responded to your comment on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bmannconsulting.com/node/1615&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my blog&lt;/a&gt;. Looks like the same stuff that was happening a year ago. I don&#039;t know about Rogers, but Shaw was/is using switches from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ellacoya.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ellacoya&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I responded to your comment on <a href="http://www.bmannconsulting.com/node/1615" rel="nofollow">my blog</a>. Looks like the same stuff that was happening a year ago. I don&#039;t know about Rogers, but Shaw was/is using switches from <a href="http://www.ellacoya.com/" rel="nofollow">Ellacoya</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

