Tuesday, November 1, 2005

Ban the Liberal Party of Canada, Quebec Wing

by alec on November 1, 2005

Gomery’s findings in a nutshell:

Chretien and Pelletier: Ultimately responsible for the whole darn mess, since the usual control mechanisms were circumvented, and the programs administered out of the PMO.  Unlikely to have personally profited.  Guilty of naivete, and stupidity.

Galliano: Picked up Pelletiers program, and enlarged it.  Guilty of influence peddling.

The ad guys (Corriveau, Brault etc): They lined their own pockets with money from the public purse, and kicked back dollars to the party that kept the money machine printing cash.  Guilty of theft, and bribery.

The Liberal Party of Canada, Quebec: They participated in the kickback scheme, took illegal donations from suspect sources, and insisted that paid "volunteers" be employed in the agencies that were recipients of their largesse.  Sounds like racketeering to me. 

Martin: exonerated.  Say what?  This comment on Daimnation really says it all for me: 

Am I to understand that the Prime Minister of Canada’s defense to charges of corruption, dating to when he was Finance Minister, is that he’s a fool not a knave?

Martin’s response:  promise to pay back the stolen money, and ban 10 individuals, including the former prime minister, from ever holding membership in the Liberal Party again. 

It’s not enough. 

How about banning the Liberal Party of Canada, Quebec wing, for a start.  It’s not like they can win in the next election anyway – they’re going to get trounced by the Bloc.  Make them sit this one out.  And what about a penalty for their behaviour?  How about treble damages for every dollar stolen from the public purse?  How about taking back Jean Chretien’s fat government pension, since taxpayers money was used to keep him in power illegally?  While they’re at it, take the pensions away from Jean Pelletier, Chuck Guite, and Alfonso Galliano too.  And what about jail time for the thieves who happily bilked Canadian tax payers out of $100 million?

Silly me. I forgot.  Paul Martin’s a fool, not a knave.

{ 0 comments }

Two Big Pieces of News Today

by alec on November 1, 2005

I’ll be writing a little later today about two big, but unrelated, news items. Microsoft is expected to announce further expansions of it’s Web Services offerings in San Francisco.  And, here in Canada, the preliminary findings of the Gomery Inquiry are to be made public. The Globe and Mail has already leaked some of this information.  Our government could fall within the week. 

{ 0 comments }

Introducing SoftGnome

November 1, 2005

A couple of days ago, I was given the opportunity to preview the SoftGnome beta which is being launched today.  SoftGnome is a softphone service for PhoneGnome.  PhoneGnome is providing a branded version of the NCH Express Talk phone,  but you can use any SIP phone (plastic or softphone).  The SoftGnome service simply uses PhoneGnome as the media gateway.  What that means [...]

Read the full article →

The Color Purple: Voice 2.0?

November 1, 2005

Jeff Pulver weighs in this morning with his take on Voice 2.0: Jeff says It’s Purple!  Purple Minutes is a term coined by Jeff in 2000 to describe minutes of voice traffic associated with enhanced telephony applications.   In other words — application driven, premium value minutes.  Absolutely! Voice 2.0 is Purple+.  It adds these two elements [...]

Read the full article →

Werbach on Business Model

November 1, 2005

Kevin Werbach wrote another great piece yesterday on the inversion of business models.  It’s about the way in which some businesses are providing the core service for free and charging for add-on’s.  "But what if the connectivity were free, the applications were free, and users paid only for the add-ons? Could that ever work?", he asks, [...]

Read the full article →
Alec on LinkedIn Alec on Twitter Alec on Facebook Calliflower on Youtube RSS Feed Contact me