<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Reorg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=microsoft-reorg</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MSN / Yahoo -- Alec Saunders .LOG</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>MSN / Yahoo -- Alec Saunders .LOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-341</guid>
		<description>[...] These are the basic services for any kind of Voice 2.0 application &#8212; presence, text, voice.&#160; Microsoft, anyway, has a commitment to SIP, as I have written previously.&#160; Today, Yahoo has little in the way of API support for IM, and Microsoft only marginally more.&#160;To the extent that both companies continue to create developer opportunities around these platforms, this interoperability announcement could be a huge benefit to the industry.&#160; Microsoft&#8217;s recent reorg leaves me hopeful that is their direction.&#160;A clear sign&#160;of this intent would be to publish APIs for presence,&#160;test messaging and call control. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] These are the basic services for any kind of Voice 2.0 application &#8212; presence, text, voice.&nbsp; Microsoft, anyway, has a commitment to SIP, as I have written previously.&nbsp; Today, Yahoo has little in the way of API support for IM, and Microsoft only marginally more.&nbsp;To the extent that both companies continue to create developer opportunities around these platforms, this interoperability announcement could be a huge benefit to the industry.&nbsp; Microsoft&#8217;s recent reorg leaves me hopeful that is their direction.&nbsp;A clear sign&nbsp;of this intent would be to publish APIs for presence,&nbsp;test messaging and call control. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Off Microsoft &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Opinions on the Microsoft Reorganization</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Off Microsoft &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Opinions on the Microsoft Reorganization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-340</guid>
		<description>[...] Alec Saunders in Microsoft Reorg points out that &#8220;folding MSN into the platforms group is explicitly placing it where it can be most turned into a Web Services 2.0 company. We&#8217;ve seen inklings of this already, as MSN has started to expose APIs [application programming interfaces].&#8221; [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alec Saunders in Microsoft Reorg points out that &#8220;folding MSN into the platforms group is explicitly placing it where it can be most turned into a Web Services 2.0 company. We&#8217;ve seen inklings of this already, as MSN has started to expose APIs [application programming interfaces].&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders Kargaard Jensen</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders Kargaard Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 06:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-339</guid>
		<description>Really interesting views there! Especially I am looking forward, to see how Microsoft MSN will be able to compete with Google, as I write about on my blog: http://investinsearch.blogspot.com/

It will be interesting to see the strategic changes at MSN now, and what they can come up with!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting views there! Especially I am looking forward, to see how Microsoft MSN will be able to compete with Google, as I write about on my blog: <a href="http://investinsearch.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://investinsearch.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>It will be interesting to see the strategic changes at MSN now, and what they can come up with!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-338</guid>
		<description>As seen on news.com: 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Bloggers+debate+what+reorg+means+for+Microsoft/2100-1014_3-5876267.html?tag=nefd.top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://news.com.com/Bloggers+debate+what+reorg+me...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As seen on news.com:<br />
  <a href="http://news.com.com/Bloggers+debate+what+reorg+means+for+Microsoft/2100-1014_3-5876267.html?tag=nefd.top" rel="nofollow">http://news.com.com/Bloggers+debate+what+reorg+me&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech 2 Market &#187; Microsoft reorganization - the next wave?</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech 2 Market &#187; Microsoft reorganization - the next wave?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 05:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/20/microsoft-reorg/#comment-337</guid>
		<description>[...] Alec Saunders posted an interesting comment in his blog on the recent Microsoft reorganization. If you didn&#8217;t hear about the reorg - ZDNets updated coverage is pretty good. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alec Saunders posted an interesting comment in his blog on the recent Microsoft reorganization. If you didn&#8217;t hear about the reorg &#8211; ZDNets updated coverage is pretty good. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

