<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Industry Perspective: Jeffrey Citron</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/09/19/industry-perspective-jeffrey-citron/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/09/19/industry-perspective-jeffrey-citron/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=industry-perspective-jeffrey-citron</link>
	<description>An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and  marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Kelemen</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/09/19/industry-perspective-jeffrey-citron/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Kelemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/19/industry-perspective-jeffrey-citron/#comment-330</guid>
		<description>What Citron is proposing is more of a service provider&#039;s bill of rights to use a network. A true broadband bill of rights would have as its cornerstone two things: 100% public ownership (but not public admin/operation) and fair and equitable right to use. No one&#039;s done this yet.

The kind of applications we use on the network is a problem. But we are fast approaching a situation where network owner dictates which destinations we can visit and which ones we can&#039;t.

To illustrate, let&#039;s say you wanted to visit your aunt in Barrie, Ontario. But the gas station (owned by the oil company) decides they want to limit the number of people who can visit Barrie because they don&#039;t like the town (or some other similarly arbitrary reason) and force you to pay 4 times more for gas. Would we accept this? I think not. Yet this is in fact the case with so-called &quot;high speed&quot; services. It&#039;s called by various names &quot;traffic shaping&quot;, &quot;bandwidth management&quot; and so on.

What we need is grass-roots support (I&#039;d say demand) for a broadband bill of rights that de-privatizes the infrastructure (and keeps it from being used by big corporations simply to make money).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Citron is proposing is more of a service provider&#8217;s bill of rights to use a network. A true broadband bill of rights would have as its cornerstone two things: 100% public ownership (but not public admin/operation) and fair and equitable right to use. No one&#8217;s done this yet.</p>
<p>The kind of applications we use on the network is a problem. But we are fast approaching a situation where network owner dictates which destinations we can visit and which ones we can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>To illustrate, let&#8217;s say you wanted to visit your aunt in Barrie, Ontario. But the gas station (owned by the oil company) decides they want to limit the number of people who can visit Barrie because they don&#8217;t like the town (or some other similarly arbitrary reason) and force you to pay 4 times more for gas. Would we accept this? I think not. Yet this is in fact the case with so-called &#8220;high speed&#8221; services. It&#8217;s called by various names &#8220;traffic shaping&#8221;, &#8220;bandwidth management&#8221; and so on.</p>
<p>What we need is grass-roots support (I&#8217;d say demand) for a broadband bill of rights that de-privatizes the infrastructure (and keeps it from being used by big corporations simply to make money).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/09/19/industry-perspective-jeffrey-citron/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/19/industry-perspective-jeffrey-citron/#comment-329</guid>
		<description>ummm... what&#039;s to imply? We&#039;re trying to use Vonage for our business lines at Iotum, and it&#039;s not always a great experience. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ummm&#8230; what&#039;s to imply? We&#039;re trying to use Vonage for our business lines at Iotum, and it&#039;s not always a great experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aswath</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/09/19/industry-perspective-jeffrey-citron/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Aswath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/19/industry-perspective-jeffrey-citron/#comment-328</guid>
		<description>Also if he says that he needs QOS, then wouldn&#039;t that imply that his current service is somehow below par? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also if he says that he needs QOS, then wouldn&#039;t that imply that his current service is somehow below par?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/09/19/industry-perspective-jeffrey-citron/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/19/industry-perspective-jeffrey-citron/#comment-327</guid>
		<description>You would think so, but I think that at this point Jeffrey is really just focused on the &quot;do no harm&quot; aspects of the industry.  QOS would be great, but strategically what he has to do is make sure he doesn&#039;t get blocked out altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would think so, but I think that at this point Jeffrey is really just focused on the &#8220;do no harm&#8221; aspects of the industry.  QOS would be great, but strategically what he has to do is make sure he doesn&#8217;t get blocked out altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/09/19/industry-perspective-jeffrey-citron/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/19/industry-perspective-jeffrey-citron/#comment-326</guid>
		<description>So I wondered why he didn&#039;t address QOS. You would think he would throw something on QOS in because he&#039;s a VoIP provider, but no. So I went up to him and asked him but he explained it away saying you can&#039;t put something in that serves one industry like VoIP. I disagree. Why shouldn&#039;t some level of quality of service be part of the package. I think of the whole Broadband Bill of Rights like an SLA. Making QOS part of it is the right thing to do. I want you to prioritize packets the way I ask them to be prioritized. I don&#039;t get it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I wondered why he didn&#8217;t address QOS. You would think he would throw something on QOS in because he&#8217;s a VoIP provider, but no. So I went up to him and asked him but he explained it away saying you can&#8217;t put something in that serves one industry like VoIP. I disagree. Why shouldn&#8217;t some level of quality of service be part of the package. I think of the whole Broadband Bill of Rights like an SLA. Making QOS part of it is the right thing to do. I want you to prioritize packets the way I ask them to be prioritized. I don&#8217;t get it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vonage Day 1 Wrap -- Alec Saunders .LOG</title>
		<link>http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/09/19/industry-perspective-jeffrey-citron/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Vonage Day 1 Wrap -- Alec Saunders .LOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 02:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/19/industry-perspective-jeffrey-citron/#comment-325</guid>
		<description>[...] Alec Saunders .LOG  Alec Saunders&#8217; personal soapbox on World Events, Canadian Politics, and the Technology Business       &#171; Industry Perspective: Jeffrey Citron [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alec Saunders .LOG  Alec Saunders&#8217; personal soapbox on World Events, Canadian Politics, and the Technology Business       &laquo; Industry Perspective: Jeffrey Citron [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

