Comments on: Skype Spam http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/09/14/skype-spam/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=skype-spam An outcome-driven leader, proven technology product developer, and marketer with over 20 years of hands-on experience including start-up, small and large business environments, and the board room. This is my blog. Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:15:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Alec http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/09/14/skype-spam/#comment-311 Alec Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:25:38 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/14/skype-spam/#comment-311 I guess it remains to be seen how they implement the lead generation feature, doesn't it? Although EBay buyers and sellers could route around EBay by email, most don't. I wonder why? I guess it remains to be seen how they implement the lead generation feature, doesn’t it? Although EBay buyers and sellers could route around EBay by email, most don’t. I wonder why?

]]> By: Aswath http://www.saunderslog.com/2005/09/14/skype-spam/#comment-310 Aswath Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:08:54 +0000 http://saunderslog.com/2005/09/14/skype-spam/#comment-310 I agree that Register is off base. In lead generation, I thought the buyer is the one who will originate the call to the seller. So where is the problem of SPIT? At the same time, I just do not see "$2 to $12 per lead" for voice calls. If that is what EBay is going to charge, the sellers will just settle for pay per click model, with the click enabling "callto" capability available in Skype. I agree that Register is off base. In lead generation, I thought the buyer is the one who will originate the call to the seller. So where is the problem of SPIT?

At the same time, I just do not see "$2 to $12 per lead" for voice calls. If that is what EBay is going to charge, the sellers will just settle for pay per click model, with the click enabling "callto" capability available in Skype.

]]>